Anyway, to pass the time of day here's a little something from the culture war desk, from Adam Bellow -- yes, I thought he was doing alright too; not only does he have his dad's name and money and a related career in publishing, he's also got a stake in Liberty Island, the wingnut welfare arts site covered here a few times. Sounds cushy, but every so often I guess he still has to rattle the tin cup. Here he is at National Review:
We need to invest in the conservative right brain. A well-developed feeder system exists to identify and promote mainstream fiction writers, including MFA programs, residencies and fellowships, writers’ colonies, grants and prizes, little magazines, small presses, and a network of established writers and critics. Nothing like that exists on the right.
This is a major oversight that must be urgently addressed. We need our own writing programs, fellowships, prizes, and so forth. We need to build a feeder system so that the cream can rise to the top, and also to make an end run around the gatekeepers of the liberal establishment.Ca-chunk! Ca-chunk! The clot of coins bangs inside the can. Keep a brave front, Adam; Richard Mellon Scaife is dead, we have to hustle.
Conservative leaders are more concerned with raising money for political campaigns than supporting the new cultural creators.It's a point he can sell: Even the rubes are catching on that the big outfits to which they've been entrusting their donations are not delivering bang for buck. But no one knows what will: You can't trust those tea party guys, either. So maybe put money in conservative art? Their pig eyes narrow: Do I have to dress up for galas? It is abstract, or done by fags? It would take too long to explain, so he goes straight for the Iron Curtain -- you boys remember that! The fellas who invested in samizdat, they really cleaned up, morally speaking! You don't want to miss this opportunity to take down Commissar Obama:
Today’s conservative fiction writers are not in danger of having their fingers hammered in a labor camp. But their self-publishing efforts do represent a modern analogue to the dissident samizdat movement, and they are deploying the same weapons in defense of your freedom of conscience. Can we really afford to ignore them?They're grabbing their coats! Quick, wheel out the big gun:
I know what Andrew Breitbart would say if he were here:Okay, some of them are staying -- maybe they're passed out, or just wondering if you have any coke, but they're here, so they're half-in: Now all you have to do is establish the connection between that wad of cash their financial manager advised them to throw down a sinkhole (as long as the papers are in order) and that country they love so well:
What good will it do to write a novel? May as well ask what good it did to show the revolutionary flag at Bunker Hill (a battle we lost, by the way).One good thing about this racket: If they do go for it, you don't have to worry about them coming to their senses later.
UPDATE. At the Washington Post, Alyssa Rosenberg tries to be helpful, suggesting that if conservative novelists would just use their "aesthetic powers" they might get somewhere. I imagine Bellow, tipped to the presence of upscale attention, checking his cup for folding money. Look, lady, when a beggar asks for money don't give him a lecture!
UPDATE 2. Making everything worse as usual, Jonah Goldberg tells us the liberals who run Hollywood actually make lots of conservative entertainments because that's what sells ("Most Hollywood liberals probably oppose the death penalty, yet they make lots of movies where the bad guy meets a grisly death to the cheers of the audience"). A sane person might ask: if Liberal Hollywood is making the bloodthirsty entertainments conservatives like, what is Goldberg bitching about? See Bellow, Adam: They may fantasize about being treated with the respect due an artist, but what they really want is their names above the titles and (especially) on the checks. All the rest, as someone once said, is propaganda.
We need to build a feeder system so that the cream can rise to the top
ReplyDelete...psst - that's not cream
Doesn't mean it's not part of a feeder system.
ReplyDeleteWhy do you think they're always using the phrase "cramming down our throats"?
I get it, this is one of those fvcebook-type experiments where you manipulate the readers to see how they react. Well, I have confidence in the commentariat: They will produce material just as good* even without a column to hook it to! Allons, enfants ...
ReplyDelete*For some values of good
We must make the walls of the bubble THICKER!
ReplyDeleteOh for the love of Lucky Charms! If you want to kickstart the "conservative right brain", the one way you don't get there is to start the arts-centered version of Liberty University. TS Eliot was a Harvard man. Russell Kirk went to the state school in Michigan and then did graduate work at Duke. I'm not saying everybody has to go to an elite institution, but an exclusively wingnut institution is dead in the water.
ReplyDeleteBut don't listen to me. Listen to the guy who inherited Saul Bellow's name, harrumphing politics and golf clubs but missed out on dad's ability to write books people want to read.
Oh, poor dear Adam. He doesn't have a clue. This is elementary, Mr. Bellow: the right brains of right-wingers are just as diseased as their left hemispheres.
ReplyDeleteBeyond that simple truth, the wingers already have prodigious numbers of bad fiction writers, toiling diligently in the think tanks and pundit classes of wingnut welfaredom.
Don't expect any better than that.
We need to invest in the conservative right brain
ReplyDeleteWell, there's your problem right there.
Not if you're shorting.
ReplyDeleteBuy low and sell BENGHAZZZZIIIIIIII!!!!!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteI guess Regnery doesn't have any fiction editors, so, what might be a model for this "feeder system?"
ReplyDeleteAh, yes, I know. But it needs a name. Let's call it, say, "Minitru."
The Scum Also Rises.
ReplyDeleteSmells like more of the usual grift. Ninety-five percent of what gets raised, stay with the organization for admin. The rest gets dribbled out to earnest kids.
ReplyDeleteAlso, gotta admire trying to raise money using a money-losing vehicle like NR.
Sounds like the system they use for producing foie gras.
ReplyDeleteIt's the system they're using for producing faux gravitas.
ReplyDeleteConservative fiction writers don't have to publish novels. They can get highly paid jobs making up news.
ReplyDeleteI said this to my father when we were discussing the passing of RMScaife. He was worried about what the disbursal of Scaife's money would do to the left but I pointed out that now that it has been given out to whatever institutes and pacs and Scaife himself has toddled off to hell there is nothing to stop them from blowing it on hookers and coke. Or meth, I suppose, for the upper crust. At any rate we really don't have to worry about them getting any bang-ier for their buck than that.
ReplyDelete...their self-publishing efforts do represent a modern analogue to the dissident samizdat movement...
ReplyDeleteApparently, all those times my novel was rejected, it wasn't because all those agents thought the market couldn't bear it, it was because of politics. Hey, this is easy! Nothing's my fault now.
Seriously though, this idea that conservatives are being hedged out of publishing is preposterous on its face. There are already plenty of conservative small presses, but what about the big guys? Simon & Schuster has an entire imprint - Threshold - that's dedicated solely to conservative nonfiction. Their Atria imprint handles Brad Thor's Tom Clancy fanfiction, and S&S has even published some of Glenn Beck's picture books. And that's just one publisher - Lord knows HarperCollins has fielded enough movement con crap.
It's amazing to me that anyone trying break into a market as saturated and competitive as publishing would blame their failure on anything other than the long-shot odds every non-celebrity faces.
Don't know this guy Art, but I've no desire to discuss the other three.
ReplyDeleteTo guys like this, liberals control everything, so there's no point in distinguishing between "liberal" and "mainstream." The sheer number of conservative nonfiction books and novels by conservative writers in recent years are presumably manner of trick.
ReplyDeleteHey, it takes a lot of effort to use your father's name to get a job and then leverage that to get your employer to publish your book.
ReplyDeleteThey don't just want a presence in the ideas market. They don't just want to dominate it. They want to obliterate the "liberal" competition, to be the single voice of the culture, even though they pretty much just plain flat suck.
ReplyDeleteWhich is why it's always quite funny to see these occasional appeals for a programmatic approach to literature or art or the culture as a whole. Because they've simultaneously been brain-damaged by their nostalgic obsessions with an imaginary past and they can't seem to control their authoritarian urges, these inevitably are composed of equal parts "gee whiz, kids, hey, I know! Let's put on a show!" and the Stalinist "writers are the engineers of human souls."
As a result, such pleadings always come off as desperate and dumb.
Creativity and the conservative thought process just don't mix too well or too often. Better stick to wingnut welfare.
ReplyDelete...amazing to me that anyone trying break into a market as saturated and
ReplyDeletecompetitive as publishing would blame their failure on anything other
than the long-shot odds...
Look, they tried writing a book. Now they're going to try being a whiny-ass titty baby over what happened to their book. Maybe they'll get some money out of it; maybe they won't. It sure beats working for a living.
It doesn't help that they've cultivated anti-intellectualism among the base. If monsieur Bellow ever showed up at a 'bagger rally, he'd get stomped by the "Get a brain, morans" guy.
ReplyDeletea modern analogue to the dissident samizdat movement
ReplyDeleteSure, once you dismiss the informants, five flavors of secret police, state torture, secret trials and executions, gulags, internal travel documents, registered mimeograph machines, absolutely no freedom of speech nor any expectation of the same, one-party rule, and the existence of an enormous bureaucracy dedicated to utterly eliminating criticism of the State, 1960's USSR and the USA fifty years on are almost exactly the same.
"I know what Andrew Breitbart would say if he were here"
ReplyDeleteI imagine the What Would Andrew Breitbart Say (WWABS) rubber bracelets are not going to be a hot seller in the Reagan Presidential Library gift shop and coffee emporium.
"I know what Andrew Breitbart would say if he were here"
ReplyDeleteGet me out of this goddamn coffin!
Quite so. Still, in the midst of that anti-intellectualism, they have the next best thing: "Our propaganda is superior to their propaganda!"
ReplyDeleteI'll just leave this here:
ReplyDeletehttp://media.npr.org/assets/bakertaylor/covers/i/in-praise-of-nepotism/9780385493895_custom-ea7f802af12ba8592d66aa5a5ce0afd086495674-s6-c30.jpg
Nothing like that exists on the right.
ReplyDeleteThis from a guy with a sinecure at one of the more famous right-wing propaganda catapaults. What if they got you a nicer desk chair, Adam?
Today’s conservative fiction writers are not in danger of having their fingers hammered in a labor camp.
Indeed, today's conservative writers tend to have quite the resume in avoiding labor entirely.
But their self-publishing efforts do represent a modern analogue to the dissident samizdat movement
Except for, you know, any of the actual risk.
and they are deploying the same weapons in defense of your freedom of conscience.
Except the skill. And the idealism. And, you know, any actual risk.
Can we really afford to ignore them?
Given that your alternative is to give them more money because they can't compete in the free market of ideas, I'd have to say yes.
I know what Andrew Breitbart would say if he were here:
Something incoherent, muffled by coke-laced vomitus? Keep at it, Adam; you're halfway there.
May as well ask what good it did to show the revolutionary flag at Bunker Hill (a battle we lost, by the way).
It was also fought primarily on an entirely different hill, which seems relevant to this analogy, somehow.
Thanks for clarifying that. I knew vore involves the desire to be devoured, I just thought the feeder fetish was considered a subset/inversion of vore.
ReplyDeleteGet you out of the coffin? Sorry, Andy. You built breitbart.com, now you have to lie in it.
ReplyDeleteI first read this as "walls of rubber". Actually, that might be a wise idea too.
ReplyDeleteGoddammit, you got to it before I could. Though I was thinking something more along the lines of
ReplyDelete"Aaaaaarrrrrgggghhhh" whilst clutching his chest.
It's like a cry for help that he got paid to write.
ReplyDeleteI suspect that young Mr. Bellow is attempting to create--in rather halfhearted fashion--something akin to the so-called Powell Manifesto. Powell's advice was endorsed by the zombie rich and after forty years of steady infusions of raw cash into a system of think tanks, speakers' bureaus, publishing houses and PR shops, they've managed to create a nicely solipsistic system inside the Beltway that, thanks to a lazy news media, pretty much runs on autopilot now.
ReplyDeleteBut, how exactly does this work with popular culture? It's one thing to have a cadre of bright-eyed true-believing drones churning out policy papers and opinion pieces for the expressed purpose of being nattered on about on Fox News, or a squadron of bomb-throwers writing incendiaries which Regnery then sells off in lots to the same think tanks as donation gifts, but it's quite another thing to write fiction for the general public, let alone get nods of approval from the intelligentsia.
If its primary intention is to push an ideology, chances are it's going to be lousy, and the public holds its nose and says, "stinkeroonie!" There's a very good reason why the Ayn Rand Institute has to give away copies of Atlas Shrugged.
Google informs me that Pho Gras is a thing.
ReplyDeleteThe Old Man and the Free-Market Sea
ReplyDeleteFor Whom the NYSE Bell Tolls
A Free Trade in Arms
Alternatively, they don't want to either dominate or exterminate, they just want something to bitch about...
ReplyDeleteI refuse to depart the luxurious confines of the boat and thus can only surmise, but with some certainty, that the seed for this pitch was the awful, awful way the liberal science fiction snooterati treated that nice Vox Day fellow.
ReplyDeleteThey acted like he was a villain! They booted him from a non-political professional writer's association! It's like you can't use the SFWA's official Twitter feed to distribute even -one- racist tirade. And then, Vox Day lost an election to become SFWA President, but we all know about liberals and their "elections," plus it's a stupid position and he didn't want it anyway and also too liberal fascism.
Not gonna list 'em all because a) I don't know all of 'em, and b) I'm lazy and it's not worth it, but Jebus, doesn't this guy know the fiction market is verily awash with what can only be called Libertarian fiction? Maybe not "Conservative", but a fur piece from the hated "Liberal" fiction for sure. OK, I'll name just a few I happen to know, because I've read (bought! With money! And enjoyed!) a lot of their work. Robert Heinlein, Larry Niven, Jerry Pournelle, F Paul Wilson, David Brin, John Varley, Vernor Vinge (Dunno if Varley and Vinge consider themselves Libs, but a lot of their fans do). There have to be a lot more, and these guys have stature in their field, if not fame & fortune.
ReplyDeleteYeah, I know, I'm answering a Conservative whackjob with facts and reality, but that's all I got. Sometimes I wonder what it must be like to live immersed in fantasy like that, but really, I don't want to know...
He could found a new school of art: Central-to My-Pointillism. Which, to the untutored eye would look a lot like Impressionist style paint-by-numbers.
ReplyDeleteAlso too, it would necessarily be done in black and white...
Regnery doesn't have any fiction editors
ReplyDeleteA shame, because they have a lot of fiction writers...
I have a name for a new Conservative fiction genre, and it could double as their very own bookstore chain: Gobbledebook™.
ReplyDeleteThose ladders have splinters!
ReplyDeleteThe worst that could happen, from a Leftish POV, is an honest and competent money manager takes control of the estate, and keeps the wingnut welfare money rolling out. Too many vultures flapping around an estate that big, though, so I don't think we have to worry...
ReplyDeleteYou think every time they hear "Left Behind" they think "Left Buttock" like I do? No, prolly not...
ReplyDeleteYou just know that if Adam Bellow had encountered a software problem trying to publish his column, by now we'd have twenty zillion screeching blog posts across the wingnutsphere about how Movable Type was part of the liberal censorship regime.
ReplyDeleteOnly white. With the occasional brown dot that had proved itself willing to commit a felony for the cause.
ReplyDeletePeter Hamilton is pretty libertarian/con too.
ReplyDeleteMind you, I think Libertarianism is the default hard SF universe now. You know individual owns own ship, pilots same for purposes of profit, pan-galactic government either malicious or stupid etc. It'd be much harder to make a plot where the corporations own the ship and you have to present 578 SWOT analyses to various levels of management before being allowed to investigate the mysterious signal. You wouldn't get started until page 378.
You have to love the review quote at the top: "Finally-- someone has come along with the courage to defend the status quo of the last 9000 years!"
ReplyDeleteWell, there is a Black Democrat in the White House (the house that St. Ronnie built!!!), so in most ways, America today is far, far worse than the Soviet Union ever was. After all, Obama is worse than Stalin, Hitler, and Pol Pot combined.
ReplyDeleteRight-wing haiku. Reactionary watercolors.
ReplyDeleteIt's Stormfront's annual Festival of the Arts Hate.
Doesn't that make Alien the ultimate Libertarian movie? The corporation wants to bring the horribly destructive alien back to Earth to turn it into a weapon, and it's no big deal if all the employees get killed in the process. So long as the company gets its profits!
ReplyDeleteI'll bet the Libertarians cry at the end, and hope Sigourney Weaver gets fired and sued.
Hmm, shit, we are well on the way. Plenty of informants these days, lessee, five flavors of secret police (umm, DEA, FBI, CIA, NSA, local police, state fusion centers), state torture, check, secret trials, check, executions, check, gulags (well, so-called black sites, and what the hell else would one call Guantanamo?), even secret laws, haven't quite reached one-party rule, despite what KKKarl and The Hammer think, but, they're still trying.
ReplyDeleteStill, odd that all those features of modern America came into being under a conservative government.... Does that mean that the hero of conservative fiction is... Dick Cheney?
Nothing like that exists on the right.
ReplyDeleteNothing like what, literacy? Surely he can't be completely ignorant of wingnut welfare given that it pays his bills.
"... to George W. Bush" = remainder bin.
ReplyDeleteOh snap.
ReplyDeleteOooooh!
ReplyDeleteThose" Left Behind" cocktail parties can be strenuous. The hydration requirements of a bunch of guys wearing two wetsuits tend to stifle conversation.
ReplyDeleteYep, the various Scaife family members and attorneys are beating the shit out each other about now. And when they find out how much money the estate lost in the housing bubble, that shit will turn liquid.
ReplyDeleteMy face has done come off!
ReplyDeleteYou forgot the Secret Service (the original!) and the NSA. There's also the federal services that are trying to get into the police business. You mentioned the DEA, but also the ATF and the TSA. (It's not that these organizations don't need enforcement, it's the usual bureaucratic nonsense that they can't get along with the FBI for those parts of their mission, so they build their own.)
ReplyDeleteStill, it is a little strange for the folks who cheered the acceleration of all this authoritarian nonsense under Little Boots now crapping their pants about it. The inversion in the thinking is wild. The folks who want the police state also want to be oppressed by the police state?
Adam Bellow's "feeder system" was a birth canal. And yeah, he loses his own argument (if there is one) in his first paragraph. Like all conservatives playing the victimhood waltz, he's hoping his readers join him in the assumption that all the things he lists to promote mainstream fiction writers will automatically be assumed to be "leftist" without his actually having to be ridiculous enough to say it -- see, all this stuff exists on the left, amirite? But where's OUR prizes 'n stuff? Fuck the free market. We need subsidized conservative propaganda!
ReplyDeleteNot to mention, what the hell is he talking about? There's a whole labyrinth of dedicated right-wing schools, colleges, grants, foundations and moneybags that fund these assholes already. Hillsdale, Liberty, Patrick Henry? Bradley Prizes anyone? Olin foundation? Hell, even Jonah Goldberg was nominated twice for the Pulitzer Prize.
[And this post was fucking hilarious, by the way.]
Thank you, I'd completely forgotten about that.
ReplyDeleteWe've all seen this about William Kristol, but it's evergreen on the subject:
Irving [Kristol] recalled how he talked to his friend Harvey Mansfield at Harvard, who secured William a place there as both an undergrad and graduate student; how he talked to Pat Moynihan, then Nixon's domestic policy adviser, and got William an internship at The White House; how he talked to friends at the RNC and secured a job for William after he got his Harvard Ph.D.; and how he arranged with still more friends for William to teach at UPenn and the Kennedy School of Government. With that, Prof. Katznelson recalled, he then asked Irving what he thought of affirmative action. "I oppose it", Irving replied. "It subverts meritocracy."
Gentlemen! We clearly need more "Right Behind" books!
ReplyDeleteYou've put way too much thought into this, BBBB.
ReplyDeleteHell, I have to believe that if he showed up at a Bellow family reunion they'd stomp him.
ReplyDeleteCentral to My Pointillism deserves some kind of shout out from this comment, but all it can do is point and mime in admiration. Because of the horror.
ReplyDeleteWell, don't forget that they are rank authoritarians: they really believe that the proletariat needs a boot on their necks to keep from misbehaving. They're only upset when the boot isn't on their foot so that they can be sure it's applied to the right necks: the blahs, the gays, the poors, those filthy muslims, slutty single wimmin, etc.
ReplyDeleteSince they think this is the way all societies have to be run, it logically follows that if the boot isn't on their foot, it must be on their enemies' foot. (Actual freedom and liberty don't enter the equation; they use very different definitions for those words.) So it's just a matter of time before that black helicopter settles on to the lawn and government thugs drag them off to FEMA re-education camps and force some compassion and tolerance down their throats. After all, they've got a list of people who need re-education....
All this, of course, helps them feel significant, as opposed to just being a middle-aged shlub poking out semi-coherent screeds in the basement of your split-level.
They've been shaking the tin cup for so long over at the it's probably hardwired into their nervous system. Maybe after you've been a professional beggar for too long you forget that there are ways to earn money.
ReplyDeleteFor a guy who is himself quite wealthy, James Cameron sure isn't hesitant to stick it to the swells. Avatar and Titanic have rich or corporate villains, Terminator 2 had them destroying a tech company, and Aliens had Paul Reiser as the perfect smarmy corporate stooge:
ReplyDeleteBurke: Hold on a second. This installation has a substantial dollar value attached to it.
Ripley: They can bill me.
"even Jonah Goldberg was nominated twice for the Pulitzer Prize."
ReplyDeleteMeaning, his publisher filled out the required form and sent it in with the required fee.
The Pulitzer people told them to knock it off. The only thing allowed (other than the prize) is to identify the other two in the top remaining three as finalists.
However, Roy does award the Farrrrrrt Award to Goldberg every few months, so there is that.
I'm envisioning Art being Crow from MST3K.
ReplyDeletehttp://mst3k.wikia.com/wiki/Art_Crow
This is yet another example of right-wingism as a religion, with all the usual features of orthodoxy: persecution complex, magical thinking, a belief in miracles (Brethren! If only we had a "feeder system" millions of conservative novels would be written and published and bought in bulk purchases! We could change the world!) etc. As usual, anything not explicitly produced by the faithful clergy is, by definition, heathen. So entire industries -- publishing, mass media, entertainment, whatever -- are commie-controlled mechanisms of propaganda, not because they are but because they must be. Bellow didn't write "nothing like that exists on the left," even though it would be true, because if it ain't right, it's gotta be left.
ReplyDeleteThis is why they are called wingnuts.
Que sera Seurat.
ReplyDeleteThis recitation by Bellow of his origin story is unintentionally amusing, as it's meant to be a rationalization of his Generic Conservative Conversion Experience. tl;dr--he was offended at the pushback that Allan Bloom ("a friend of [his] father’s", of course) got for The Closing of the American Mind, and Irving Kristol gave him a job. Shocking, right?
ReplyDeleteI want this comment to be part of the plot in my upcoming romance novel: Orange is the Old Speaker.
ReplyDeleteWho better to bitch about the lack of a right-wing literary bubble than the son of a world-famous novelist who is currently running a right-wing publishing imprint?
ReplyDeleteIt's not even shameless anymore, it's just fucking bizarre. They literally count on people not knowing anything or being able to make casual connections between what is said and who is saying it. My greatest regret is not having fleeced these suckers a decade ago.
They're all for the oppressive mechanisms of the state, provided the executive of the state has an "R" after his or her name. Slap a "D" there and it's a catastrophe.
ReplyDeleteAll I can guess is that, as soon as they're able to, conservatives will go all out to eliminate this pesky voting thing that lets Democrats sneak into government where they plainly don't belong. In their patriotic fervor to preserve freedom and the American Way, they must destroy the government of the United States and do away with the Constitution (except for the 2nd Amendment, of course--the only amendment that counts!).
You can look forward to yet more efforts to get rid of the estate tax, too. The poor family members who will not be getting 100% of the estate will just become poster children for the suffering the offspring of the hyperwealthy must endure. Alas and alack!
ReplyDeleteI think the essential cant of it is that there are still a few outlets that have a liberal outlook. Therefore, there are NO outlets at all for conservative thought, and NO conservative think tanks, radio shows, TV shows, publications, networks, etc. The mere existence of Mother Jones negates the entirety of Fox News, Club for Growth, Heritage, Cato, the Kochs, etc.
ReplyDeleteOur Heritage.
ReplyDeleteThe Liberal Stranger
Citizen Alinsky.
So go have children.
ReplyDeleteSee? That's why he wants the ladders to be pulled up after he's climbed them. He's worried about your hands.
ReplyDeleteWhat? You didn't like Firefly?
ReplyDelete"We need to build a feeder system so that the cream can rise to the top"
ReplyDeleteWorst drainage system for a circle-jerk EVER.
"We need to build a feeder system so that the cream can rise to the top,
ReplyDeleteand also to make an end run around the gatekeepers of the liberal
establishment."
Or, to put it another way, "We need to erect a farm system of conveyor belt incubators, so the diamonds in the rough can be boiled down to the blue-ribbon all-stars, and also to put the pedal to the metal to blaze a trail on a detour around the guard shacks of the gated community moats of the liberal powers that be."
Now *that's* writin'.
Firefly is no more libertarian than Huckleberry Finn. Just because a person rejects control doesn't mean he has a free market fetish.
ReplyDeleteWhedon always supports the powerless over the powerful. His characters say that the only way to increase power is to give it away.
That book s always the first thing I think about when I see his name. It's really the only thing I know about him.
ReplyDeleteThey can't give a big enough tongue-bath to the "free market" until they find out what people actually buy in it: rap music, porn, replica football jerseys, vampire lit (sexy and scary--we have both kinds!), Fifty Shades of Grey, this summer's installment of Michael Bay's war on narrative, and the rest of the goddamn 90% of everything that's subject to Sturgeon's Law. Then the 'marketplace of ideas' suddenly becomes an inbred drooling cousin that has to be locked in the attic.
ReplyDeleteThere's a lot I'm not sure about in this world, Mr. Bellow, but when the premise of your argument consists of punching yourself in the (rhetorical) balls, it's hard to get other people to come along for the ride.
We need to build a feeder system so that the cream can rise to the top
ReplyDeleteIf it needs help rising, it ain't cream.
Not to mention in that same 2004 piece:
ReplyDeleteI have long been associated with conservatives, and have published many books by right-wing authors—from Cold Warriors like Irving Kristol and Norman Podhoretz, to midlife converts like David Horowitz and Victor Davis Hanson, to rising Young Turks like David Frum and Jonah Goldberg. My circle of acquaintances includes the editors of every right-wing magazine, as well as the staffs of major think tanks and foundations, and dozens of academics, columnists, radio hosts, and bloggers.
Sounds like a "feeder system" to me. Or at the very least something productive of gas.
The best part of right-wing sites is the comments section; for example:
ReplyDelete"The right is generally genteel. Conservatives are usually reasoned and constrained in their rhetoric and behavior. The right laments that we appear to be in a culture war, but is loath to fight it."
You forget that in a post-scarcity society, words like "rich" or "inequality" or "ownership" or "property" or "capital" cease to have any real meaning.
ReplyDeleteThis the Culture, an anarcho-communist paradise, is a Libertarian nightmare. No precious property to obsess over.
Why get all sweaty building a publishing house from the ground up when you can skip directly to the fun part of people handing you lots of money?
ReplyDeleteIndeed. I often wonder - though not too much, because it's obvy innit - whether wingnuts can conceive of any way of running things other than waiting for handouts like baby birds gaping for worm-barf.
ReplyDeleteI like that word. Rolls right off the tongue.
ReplyDeleteThose moats you mentioned...they wouldn't by any chance be full of shit, would they?
ReplyDeleteTurds also float.
ReplyDelete"Central to My Pointillism"
ReplyDeleteI know nothing about art, but I know I like that!
Hell no!!
ReplyDeleteHemingway's novel about scat fetishists?
ReplyDeleteNo, but the people describing them are.
ReplyDeleteEven a turd can float to the top for a while. As Bellows, Breitbart and Pantload so aptly demonstrate.
ReplyDelete" a feeder system so that the cream can rise to the top, and also to make an end run around the gatekeepers of the liberal establishment."
ReplyDeleteOld Saul, who, whatever his politics. was a real writer, must be whirling like a dervish in his grave over that metaphor mix.
So he totally admits that the rightwing IS NOT mainstream thought. Apparently it's an artificial construct that needs life support to thrive.
ReplyDeleteI knew Adam Bellow when he was into alternate media. Once an asshole, always an asshole.
ReplyDeleteDelighted to see it. What's America about if not every man's right to crap tailored to his own taste? Abortions for some, miniature American flags for others!
ReplyDeleteIt's too bad that they want more than success, they want popularity and awards and praise from everyone else as well. Authoritarians by definition look outward for a sense of belonging, value, morality, and importance. If their society does not reinforce their beliefs they feel threatened and rejected on a personal level.
ReplyDeleteIt's pretty easy to play on these emotions to get people to buy mediocre conservative products. Masses of liberals get rejected as well but facts don't sell crap.
Well, for the sake of slapping his analogy I'm temporarily accepting his implication that they have something that might reasonably be considered somewhat cream-like. I'm generous that way. Sure, in reality they (mostly) bring turds to the punchbowl of the arts, but since he tells us even those require a lift to make it out of the depths means all they've got are stinker-sinkers.
ReplyDeleteStill, it is a little strange for the folks who cheered the acceleration
ReplyDeleteof all this authoritarian nonsense under Little Boots now crapping
their pants about it.
Not really. They're still generally in favor of the actual tools of governmental oppression. Obama's dictatorial perfidy is not being enacted through the FBI or the DEA. No, their howls about tyranny are directed towards the likes of the IRS, the Department of Health & Human Services, the EPA, OSHA, the State Department, and the Bureau of Land Management. And when Republicans control the White House, those departments are less likely to carry out their proper functions.
"YOU WILL BE ANNOYED! ANNOY ALL LIFEFORMS!"
ReplyDeleteI like how he presents the mainstream publishing world as the model for anything. Let him create a system as ineffectual, out of touch with the general population, and unprofitable for his hypothetical right-wing novelists. Then they can all start complaining about how their industry is dying.
ReplyDeleteConservative leaders are more concerned with raising money for political campaigns than supporting the new cultural creators.
ReplyDeleteThe part of me that supports people making art whether or not I like it or whether or not it's even objectively good is actually in agreement with this argument. I'd much rather conservadough be going to even a dick like Godlstein and his weird screamo fiction than Tea Party hustlers. I'd much rather they land on black and bankroll an artist I like whose politics I don't like than a politician whose politics I don't like.
The part of me that wants more Democrats in legislatures is also very much in agreement with this argument. MFAs: that's definitely been our path to a perilous hold on something like centrist hegemony.
That's not an awful lot for a movie produced and marketed specifically for the American evangelical market. By contrast, The Passion of the Christ made about ten times that amount.
ReplyDeleteThey finally found something authoritarians like--torture porn.
ReplyDeleteMore seriously that's not a coincidence. Gibson was raised by a rabid authoritarian and in many of his movies he is beaten to a pulp. The inner pain has to manifest and be acknowledged without threatening the authority of the abusive parent.
ReplyDeleteI thought $90 million for the one was really good and $60 million for the other far from bad. I haven't seen them, but I doubt they cost that much to produce.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, yay free enterprise. And the money they spend on the ticket, and a few barrels of pop and popcorn is just less money for the PAC scams and other hustlers.
-- chuckling
Seems I've been culturally out of touch as I just heard of Screamo for the first time the other day from a 13 year old girl. Kind of made me want to start a band and go back out on the road.
ReplyDeleteAnd all ye need to know.
ReplyDeleteI often wonder just how much of the claptrap written for and published in the NR the authors actually believe. I mean, so much of it is lazy, careless and dim-witted that it's hard to imagine any effort at all was expended in composition.
ReplyDeleteAS someone who has long regarded Saul Bellow as one of the very best American writers, ever, it's kind of sad to see his son turn out such drivel.
Adam Bellow's Twirling Towards Freedom Enterprises
ReplyDeleteHe's a submarine liberal.
ReplyDeleteHe seems to be implying that Ms. A. Rand failed to get the job done. I take umbrage at that - with a chaser of skepticism. One can only hope that John Stossel will make a strong stand for the one true literary lioness and acquaint Mr. Bellow with the alternative entrepreneurial wealth-generating strategy known as panhandling.
ReplyDeletePlease, it's "Alinksy," at least according to the Reichtards.
ReplyDeleteOr, if you're Pantload, your mother's name.
ReplyDeleteAnd you thought Orwell was just exaggerating for effect when he used "the jackboot is thrown into the melting pot" as a Horrible Example of mixing metaphors.
ReplyDeleteWho the fuck eats toe jam for lunch?
ReplyDeleteHow's this:
ReplyDeleteBarack Obama
Is a Muslim from Kenya
Impeach the bastard!
I read something a while back about prequalification strategies. One example was the Nigerian email scammers, who present themselves in such blatantly unbelievable fashion as to screen out anybody with even the trace of a lick of sense. That leaves the scammers to deal with only the most gullible of the gullible so that they don't have to waste their time on anybody who won't ever succumb. This is like that.
ReplyDeletePate de Fascisime
ReplyDelete"The book goes out, the bad reviews come in. You can't explain that. . ."
ReplyDeleteTo be held in Godwin Hall, Neue Reichskanzlei:
ReplyDeleteI see many of the Washington Post's well-paid righties complaining about the liberal media all the time.
ReplyDeleteIT'S NO FAIR!
~
Absolutely it does.
ReplyDeleteThere's also an interview out there with Bloody Bill in which Kristol (smiling, avuncular, as always) said that he and his conservative pals (well, he means neoconservative, but I digress) weren't "welcome in academia" (meaning, I suppose, that they weren't greeted as liberators with candy and flowers), so they came to Washington "to serve in government," which he describes as honorable and productive work for conservative intellectuals (and which, in the case of Kristol himself as chief of staff for Dan Quayle, was what can only be described as damage-control babysitting), but which, in fact, was the beginning, in the Reagan years, of what must be termed as a neoconservative infestation of government, a swarm of locusts bent on destroying government, not serving it.
ReplyDeleteAnd yet, Bloody Bill describes it as the most anodyne of revolutions, as if, having been cruelly rejected by the private club that is academia, the stalwart new conservatives came to Washington as altruists offering up their myriad skills for the good of the nation.
They've always been extraordinary bullshitters and con men and carpetbaggers sneaking in on the coattails of morons' inaugural morning coats.
Dear Brian,
ReplyDeleteI see you have a love for the classics.
Good karma coming your way!
And, with considerable unintentional humor, he name-checks every one of movement conservatism's major-league crackpots.
ReplyDeleteThis is definitely a talentless hack on the make.
Yes! What we need is the thinking man's Ayn Rand!
ReplyDeleteLet me regale you with the time I attended a conservative dinner party where the conversation consisted of long and thoughtful exegesis of George Saunders, Don DeLillo, and Donna Tartt. In the opinion of my hosts, these writers are liberal pantywaists all, socialists who do not understand human nature, America, or even sentence structure. Well, I listened politely, despite many thoroughgoing critical readings that were not breaking in my favor -- I did feel nearly all of their interpretations were a bit forced -- until I could take it no more. Then at last I set down my sweetened tea and, intending to flash some verbal ju-jitsu, to declaim irrefutably in favor of liberal ideas, to use Lorrie Moore in so doing (knowing these cons had certainly all read her Birds of America, thus it would be an apt starting point to provoke wider thought) -- I somehow only blurted "Deliverance! Classic! Me not read book but movie good! No homo." Yes, less eloquent than intended, but I felt I had exhibited grace under pressure, and indeed it was enough: A pall of silence settled over the dinner party. Clearly my conservative acquaintances realized that they had ill-considered American Literature as a whole, and their opinions on it amounted to nothing but an empty, in-group pose.
ReplyDeleteI was not invited back.
Scaife reproduced? That's depressing.
ReplyDeleteOh... my... gawd... it's Jabba the Hutt and he's... smiling.
ReplyDeleteWhen he says, "join me for lunch," I'm betting everyone takes a few steps backwards.
"... is lazy, careless and dim-witted...." Well, you've left out cruel and mean-spirited, but, that's basically modern conservatism in a nutshell.
ReplyDeleteC'mon, the writing of conservatives reflects how they think and who they are. Nothing magical about that. They are lazy, careless and dim-witted.
"Apparently it's an artificial construct that needs life support to thrive."
ReplyDeleteLife support = money.
They have lots and lots and lots of that. Of course, a good deal of it is spent on the farting boy in the bubble, but, hey, this is a feeder system prone to inefficiencies.
Brian only pawn in game of life
ReplyDeleteOof, you made me go read that! Now let me quote:
ReplyDeleteTo be honest, I wasn’t terribly impressed by Clarence Thomas; I was certainly not deceived by the Bush administration’s assurances that he was the best man for the job. Yet I was less offended by this conservative hypocrisy than by the strident attacks on Thomas by liberal interest groups... I saw an opportunity to take simultaneous aim at feminist orthodoxy and left-wing identity politics.
In other words, he confesses to being a massive cynic, water-carrier, and opportunist -- just a few paragraphs after he praises himself for his "emphasis on ideas over politics." He essentially says 'I decided I better throw everything I could at the opposition, even though I agreed with their basic premise that we could do much better than Thomas.' That is everything wrong with politics in a nutshell.
Somehow, he doesn't see it this way; he publishes a David Brock book attacking those who oppose Thomas. "It was a great countercultural movement—fun, irreverent, and pure. Ideas mattered." Yes yes, the super fun idea that Anita Hill should have laughed it off or quit. But wait. Then came the late 1990s, and Bellow found his pure and nobly irreverent movement corrupted from within:
Today the main conservative spokesmen are not serious intellectuals like Irving Kristol and William F. Buckley, whose aim was always to persuade a fair-minded opponent, but abrasive personalities like Ann Coulter and Sean Hannity, whose aim is to whip the Republican base into a froth, and get rich in the process... Politics has trumped ideas, scholars have been displaced by hired gladiators, and people like me... are left feeling increasingly alienated.
Shorter Bellow: "No fair! I started it, I should be in charge!"
Jumpin' jiminy, these assholes.
"- which ya lost?"
ReplyDelete"Sorry, Tex. They can't all be smashing victories like the Alamo."
I would like to pay for this comment's next cab ride.
ReplyDeleteRight, because there aren't enough sci-fi novels with glibertarian idealistic crap shoe-horned into them. Nothing better than reading along while an author describes a future society based on govt. invented developed and funded space travel and being reminded that we should thank Ayn Rand instead.
ReplyDeleteI remember that he was involved in a famously ugly divorce because its one of the few things that got out of his control and hit the papers. But I don't remember if he had kids.
ReplyDeleteAh yes, the conservotarian knob-fondler with the Atlas Shrugged/Rambo-Putin Slash Fic comic is the real warrior in the fight for freedom so help him out. Or else.
ReplyDeleteDo please keep track of this particular con job. I want to know what he says when the expected orgasm of cash is instead a slight damp patch on the collective undies. It is sure to be a combination of shaming and scare tactics that would put the average angsty teen to shame. "You'll be sorry you didn't give me a better allowance when I'm dead at the hands of liberal gay Black Panthers!! [door slam]"
As an aside I wonder if these hucksters know that because they got their way for eight years straight, no one has any money? Maybe they just don't care. Maybe it's reflex. Want money. Ask for money. Repeat.
the so-called Powell Manifesto.
ReplyDeleteHere's the part of the manifesto that has been a FAIL for over 40 years:
Quality Control is Essential
Essential ingredients of the entire program must be responsibility and
“quality control.” The publications, the articles, the speeches, the
media programs, the advertising, the briefs filed in courts, and the
appearances before legislative committees — all must meet the most
exacting standards of accuracy and professional excellence. They must
merit respect for their level of public responsibility and scholarship,
whether one agrees with the viewpoints expressed or not.
If its primary intention is to push an ideology, chances are it's going to be lousy, and the public holds its nose and says, "stinkeroonie!"
ReplyDeleteSo when that happens Bellow bellows "Look! Evil liberals are using laughter to verbally smoosh the fingers of Ernest P. Dripshorts, author of The Ghost of Ronald Reagan vs. Zombie Al Sharpton IN SPACE! Aux ATMs, mes amis!"
Because the point is to make money. If someone dumped several million moolahs in Bellow's McDonald's outstretched and sticky palm tomorrow, setting up the culture-saving
writing programs, fellowships, prizes, and so forth.
would become a process fraught with obstacles of a vague but definitely liberal sort, that only Bellow can fix and that can only be overcome with more money.
The Vorouroboros.
ReplyDeleteWelll, no they can't. Their belief that everyone else is getting away with it is pure projection. It's what THEY want - and plan.
ReplyDeleteFools and charlatans they may get wise, but only cream and bastards rise.
ReplyDeleteI'll have my mixed metaphors shaken, not stirred.
ReplyDelete"Conservative leaders are more concerned with raising money for political campaigns than supporting the new cultural creators."
ReplyDeleteMust resist wisecrack about this sounding better in the original German...
...And instead aloud what, precisely, would right-wing "cultural creation" actually look like?
So far, their cultural contributions seem limited to nonsensical anti-science films of incredible dullness, militia compounds, gated communities where pastel-coloured golfing attire is worn at all times, televangelism, and Fox "news".
What makes them think that crowd-funding right wing writers would produce anything better?
.
Season 2 of Dollhouse wasn't perfect by any means, but it did show the logical endpoint of companies patting themselves on the back for being "disruptive."
ReplyDeleteHey! Those Simpsons episodes didn't watch themselves, y'know.
ReplyDeleteNeeds moar beans.
ReplyDeleteArt for art's sake. Money for God's sake...
ReplyDeleteThat's why getting lost in the Metaphorest can be a bit creepy. No telling if one of them is around prospecting for their literary toadstools...
ReplyDeleteStomp him? How uncouth. I believe there's a special container of potato salad made up just for him. They took it out of the fridge about three or four days ago...
ReplyDeleteThe Two Girls and the Cup
ReplyDeleteWhy else would they be so eager for the return of an aristocracy? After spending years perfecting their skills in flattery, boot-licking, and ass kissing, they want to change to a market model where they can really capitalize on those skills.
ReplyDeleteIn God We Trust
ReplyDelete(all others pay cash)
--Jean Shepherd
*literate* fiction is their toughest nut...
ReplyDeletePoo at First Light
ReplyDelete"Send $1 to Happy Dude...Don't delay, eternal happiness is only a dollar away."
ReplyDeleteMuch as I need to get to bed right now, I need to upvote a good 10cc reference more.
ReplyDeleteThese are people who think "Red Dawn" is high drama, and that more of the same is a good thing.
ReplyDeleteIt's all manipulative dreck, but those are positive attributes to their mind. The object isn't to produce good art, or even art. It's to manufacture effective propaganda in the name of art.
Reminds me of one of my favorite Far Side cartoons -- "When potato salad goes bad," with the bowl of p.s. holding a gun on the ketchup bottle. If only...
ReplyDeleteI knew Adam Bellow when he was into alternate mediaWhat brought him back to the security of publishing houses? Failure?
ReplyDeleteWorst Food Network show evar.
ReplyDeleteWhich is to say: The Bushes and the Cheneys have plenty of money. Let them give it up. As if.
ReplyDeleteA sane person might ask: if Liberal Hollywood is making the bloodthirsty
ReplyDeleteentertainments conservatives like, what is Goldberg bitching about?Liberals are such hypocrits, betraying all the standards that Goldberg ascribes to them; also the servings are so small.
I like Anselm Keifer's "after" version.
ReplyDeletehttp://2.bp.blogspot.com/-0m5CrHoX02M/UGF8IVFdfoI/AAAAAAAAAuw/VIpy4Vi7Gns/s1600/kiefer1.jpg
Three day old potato salad? Come now--they aren't libertarian caterers.
ReplyDeletecrap shoe-horned into themAfter that metaphor, how can we be sure you're not really Adam Bellow?
ReplyDeleteWell, its certainly surprising on the merits.
ReplyDeleteActually what this reminds me of is the K Street Project--anyone remember that? I believe it was (ahem) spearheaded by Rick Santorum before his name had become a byword for effluvia. It successfully attempted to dictate who K Street could hire as lobbyists and as heads of lobbying organizations if they wanted to be successful approaching the government of George Bush. They did get former democratic congresspeople and staffers fired from lobbying jobs or frozen out of lucrative jobs as "head of" some industry groups. Bellow wants some kind of preferential option for the conservative intellectual to be excercised wherever possible--on the tv shows, on the magazine mastheads, on the beaches and in the forests...I mean in academia and in fake mirror world academia.
ReplyDeleteYup, and this:
ReplyDeleteThese were the people I had long admired as the very models of independent, politically engaged, literary-minded intellectuals. Their long, tormented journey from committed Trotskyites to liberal Cold Warriors to Reaganite neoconservatives—breaking along the way with almost everyone, including one another—had earned them the suspicion of both the left and the right. But their primary loyalty was to ideas, not parties, and though I had never met them, I considered them my honorary uncles and aunts. When I began to make the rounds as Glikes’s protégé, I felt like a returning long-lost relative.
The guy is swimming in Jews and pretends to resent the "tribalism" of the left?
The article in New York magazine dripped with contempt for actual Republicans--for these assholes "Conservative" was a term, like Indepenent, which allowed them to pretend that they weren't playing a mere supporting role in a drama being orchestrated and organized by the Money Cons and the Socio-Cons. Like anyone anywhere ever gave a fuck what Adam Bellow and his friends thought about communism, or the unionized but déclassé printers at the paper who taught him archie bunker style morals while taking union wages.
ReplyDelete"Most Hollywood liberals probably oppose the death penalty, yet they
ReplyDeletemake lots of movies where the bad guy meets a grisly death to the cheers
of the audience"
Hypocrisy or paradox? Both and neither! Hollywood libs: They have no idea/ know exactly what they're doing. (Puts on propeller beanie, spins it around and around, sticks thumb up ass, pulls out a plum, and writes, "What a good boy am I.")
"Most Hollywood liberals probably oppose the death penalty, yet they
ReplyDeletemake lots of movies where the bad guy meets a grisly death to the cheers
of the audience"
Shorter Jonah Goldberg: Conservatives have real problems understanding the difference between fantasy and reality.
(I know Jonah's an idiot, but does he not understand the difference between "fiction" and "non-fiction"? Does he not understand that we're viewing a narrative where we're privy to an omniscient view of what the bad guys are doing and their motivations for doing it that has been constructed to make the bad guys very clearly bad guys? And that in criminal cases there isn't that kind of narrative? And that's only scratching the surface of everything that is wrong with that sentence.)
More than that, Bellow glowed with pride that he had a real job with real people for about ten minutes. The depth of his rich-kid cluelessness is on display, and when he shows any awareness of it, he fairly boasts of it.
ReplyDeleteI read Saul Bellow at university. Nobody is ever going to read Adam Bellow at a university.
ReplyDeleteI saw that A Bellow won some sort of prize recently. It boggles my mind that Bellow has everything he says he needs-feeder system awards, speaking gigs, cruises, jobs, attention, you name it--and it's still not enough for him.
More prizes! More contracts! More praise and acceptance! Soon he will be able to forget that talent doesn't care how big your feeder system is. A no-talent guy is always a no-talent guy no matter who his father is.
"Most Hollywood liberals probably oppose the death penalty, yet they
ReplyDeletemake lots of movies where the bad guy meets a grisly death to the cheers
of the audience"
Fulfilling narrative expectations that are as old as human beings: How does it fucking work??
That's the creepiest painting I've ever seen.
ReplyDeleteOh, the resentment is real. He's just spent his life looking for acceptable clothes so he can take it out in public.
ReplyDeleteNot understanding the obvious has earned Jonah a living for quite a few years. Why should he change?
ReplyDeleteIsn't that the kickstarter project that's made tens of thousands of a $10 goal?
ReplyDeleteI'm happier WITH the dollar
ReplyDeleteSay what you want about The Passion, but there's no doubt it was made with sincerity, which is more than you can say for any of the other bullshit Conservative Epix of recent years *cough*Dinesh!*cough*
ReplyDeleteWell, how often DOES the child of a truly great writer succeed as well as their parent? I imagine a good psych doctoral student could get at least two theses out of Adam Bellow.
ReplyDeleteThey want to eat their cake and have a total monopoly on the baking industry too.
ReplyDeleteThat's funny. Also, so is Bellow, unintentionally; he spends a sentence describing his heroes' "tormented journey" from one set of ideas on to the next and the next and the next -- then proclaims their "primary loyalty was to ideas." Which would be true, if he hadn't just explained how it was false.
ReplyDeleteA real American would want a Jackalope upholstered Caddy
ReplyDelete