There seems to be a degradation of the concept of art that starts around the Enlightenment. Naturalism was a rejection of the spiritual art that came before it... Somewhere along the way, [art] became less about making a visionary artistic statement, and more about making a statement that was "counter-cultural" (the Dada movement, for example) and meant to shock the collective consciousness... what fit this qualification often garnered an artist fame in his own community and an increase in his paycheck...Modern art, whatta racket amirite? You may wonder how National Review let this one get away: Her last post for NR, filed from the 2008 Michigan GOP primary, contains this:
McCain has added difficulties of his own making as his Michigan campaign winds down. His sudden affinity for plaid dress shirts has ensured visually painful clashes with the blue backdrops at press briefings.We also learned from this valedictory post that "good hair and rolled-up sleeves are in the Romney blood."
Zanotti kept her own blog for a while, too, where she tackled head-on and without a helmet issues like "If [abortion] IS a killing, why don't you just throw everyone who has one in jail?!"
To answer the question outright, if its a life, then taking the life is murder. We have no problem with that assertion, and frankly, believing it to be a life makes even their arguments easier. Its hard to stand on stable ground when your fundamental argument involves a distinction you cannot prove, but allowing, for a moment, that the fetus is a human could present a wealth of not esoteric but legal defenses...[Blah blah, Margaret Sanger, the Spartans, Peter Singer, murder, etc.]
That said, its not as though making something illegal necessarily makes it punishable. Widespread recognition of the dignity and worth of human life by making it a crime to take one isn't something we brought into being by majority vote. Its a long-standing tradition. Some might call it the "natural law." Whether humans punished it was up to them...On and on through thousands of words of point-dodging, but nothing resembling an answer; those who hung on till the end, however, got some nice anti-feminist insults ("everything short of unfettered access is totally unreasonable to Anna [Quindlen], though she'd never care to admit it"), and were probably satisfied.
Then came years of banging out boob-bait for outlets such as the American Spectator; last week, while other outlets were covering the recent Department of Justice report on Ferguson with headlines like "DOJ Report Condemns Ferguson Police Department's Practices" (NPR) and "Ferguson Officials Suspended After DOJ Report Have Resigned, City Confirms" (NBC), Zanotti's Spectator dispatch was headlined "DOJ FERGUSON REPORT VINDICATES OFFICER DARREN WILSON." She has also served as a "strategic partner" at Republican consultant bullpen Hynes Communications, and occasionally goes on Catholic sites to bitch about "the stretch pants ladies’ substituting Maya Angelou poems for Gospel readings." Can't say she hasn't paid her dues!
Zanotti seems to have calmed down, or at least gotten hungry enough to send in better first drafts. Her first offering for WSJ is a thumb-sucker on the Chicago mayoral election -- did you folks know that progressives are dissatisfied with Rahm Emanuel? Zanotti characterizes the contest as "two unappealing candidates who are battling for the measly one-third of the electorate that hasn’t checked out completely," which may seem a strange way to describe Chuy Garcia, an activist who came out of nowhere to win 34% in a primary against a standing mayor, but Zanotti huffs that Garcia's "a man who has many progressive dreams and no idea how to pay for them," and though she currently lives in Chicago she really wants to move away (presumably to some conservative oasis like Fritters, Alabama, to serve as the village strategic partner), and what else do Wall Street Journal editorial page readers need to hear? I predict a bright future, for Zanotti if not America.
Looks like I'll have to trust you on this one, Roy, as the WSJ site reads "To Read the Full Story, Subscribe or Log In" which, fuck that. I do love the fact that she's called women on the carpet for showing cleavage on an airplane and her blog's background is an upskirt shot.
ReplyDeletesounds like her future may be more toward the fox news end of the spectrum
ReplyDeleteArt degraded
ReplyDelete"Conservative Princess," huh?
ReplyDeleteTo answer the question outright, if its a life, then taking the life is murder...That said, its not as though making something illegal necessarily makes it punishable.
Truly, if there's one legal conundrum that man has struggled with since the Babylonians carved the first codes, it is "Should we punish murderers? I mean, it's bad, but do we really want to put ourselves out to stop it?"
"the fox news end of the speculum", nicht wahr?
ReplyDeleteMoreso than now? You must mean when Peggy stops using consonants.
ReplyDeleteWeirdly, there was a time when the Wall Street Journal was an actual news outlet. Hard to imagine now...
ReplyDeleteyou've been dunham'd, chicago!
ReplyDeleteWidespread recognition of the dignity and worth of human life by making it a crime to take one isn't something we brought into being by majority vote. Its a long-standing tradition. Some might call it something we do when we're promoting Clint Eastwood films.
ReplyDeleteGet a copy of Gotham : a history of New York to 1998
ReplyDeleteThere just isn't any news.
Part of it is our fault, but not most, us being poor..
It started when Watteau painted people having emotions.
ReplyDeleteit's simple. Sell that stuff to the Kochs.
Modern art, whatta racket amirite? You may wonder how National Review let this one get away
ReplyDeleteShe got sick of being chained to Jonah's dais.
That said, its not as though making something illegal necessarily makes it punishable.
ReplyDeleteThis describes dumping fucktons of toxic waste into the environment to a "T".
but Zanotti huffs that Garcia's "a man who has many progressive dreams and no idea how to pay for them."
ReplyDeleteFunny, Fred Hiatt and company (America's Worst Editorial Board) wrote very close to the same thing.
~
Another talking point pulled from the Conservative Hive Ass.
ReplyDeleteReference:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.eschatonblog.com/2015/03/special-interest-groups.html
Now a hashtag...
https://twitter.com/hashtag/AmericasWorstEditorialBoard?src=hash
~
if its a life, then taking the life is murder
ReplyDeleteits not as though making something illegal necessarily makes it
punishable.
Its a long-standing tradition
So her blogging platform did not support apostrophes? I do not envy the task of her WSJ copy-editors.
RIP, art. You were a valid "visionary artistic statement" only when you
ReplyDeletewere limited to highly stylized, literal depictions of Bible stories.
Then you betrayed vision, and became about other things in life, and
suddenly just 400 years later the Great War made Western
Civilization absurd a couple dozen artists in New York
and Paris trying to make each other laugh proved the game had been up
since the Mayflower Compact turned the Calvinists into Commies.
Zanotti appears to be convinced that artists receive regular salaried remuneration:
ReplyDeletewhat fit this qualification often garnered an artist fame in his own community and an increase in his paycheck
It is as if she speaks to us from a parallel universe, a Zhdanovite utopia.
If she wants to get away from all those rootless cosmopolitans, I think our friend Mr. Dreher has seemed lonely lately. I'm sure they could make beautiful (pre-Englightenment) music together, if only she's willing to convert to the Eastern church.
ReplyDeleteWhen in doubt, throw it out.
ReplyDeleteEver since Lascaux, everything has been derivative.
ReplyDelete"Why is there a deckline above an empty white rectangle on the op-ed page?"
ReplyDeleteBy no idea how to pay for them, conservatives mean WE don't want rich people to pay anything.
ReplyDeleteWith the 2016 presidential campaign warming up, you can look for all the greatest-hits talking points on why the rich shouldn't be taxed. My local paper had one on Friday: The rich shouldn't be taxed because they give to charities. If that's the standard, my buying a case of Thin Mints should relieve me of all tax-paying responsibilities.
Since Conservatoids (and their primitive offshoots the Libertardians) hate the very idea of paying for modern society, they should investigate this new-fangled form of government called Communism, wherein Public service is FREE.
ReplyDeleteI think we'll eventually arrive at a place where those with net worth above $20 million will live tax-free, with taxes increasing steadily as income goes down. By the time you get down to $35,000/year in straight salary, your base tax rate will be 90%, and laws will be passed forcing you to use the remainder of your income on gas to drive to WalMart for mandatory weekly shopping.
ReplyDeleteif its a life, then taking the life is murder. We have no problem with that assertion...
ReplyDelete"DOJ FERGUSON REPORT VINDICATES OFFICER DARREN WILSON."
Well she certainly has the neo-con attitude of "Once it breathes air, we just don't care," down pat.
People who fail to meet their weekly shoppligations will be sentenced to work at WalMart for .50 an hour until they can pay off their court fees and the moneyt they owe to WalMart.
ReplyDeleteGreat stuff: so there's some small, desiccated vestige of decency in her soul that knows damn well that abortion isn't remotely equivalent to murder and rebels at the notion of it being punished as such, but that does NOT mean she is going to give up the self-righteous thrill of pretending. After all, isn't shrieking at women going into clinics what's REALLY important here? I've gotta get me some shades; this Moral Clarity is positively blinding.
ReplyDeleteThere seems to be a degradation of the concept of art that starts around the Enlightenment. Naturalism was a rejection of the spiritual art that came before it...
ReplyDeleteThat, or artists started having other patrons than the church.
Hell, I read today that some conservative economic courtesan thought that the Rubio/Lee tax plan is potentially the most dynamic economic plan since the pulsating white heat of The Coolidgeconomy.
Which, connecting the two thoughts, means I can understand the basic concept of 'he who pays the piper calls the tune' better than any conservative, anywhere, even as they worship the free market as dogma. Cognita ergo sum has never quite been able to capture the conundrum at the heart of the conservative intellectual project.
Urg was hack -- Merg
ReplyDelete"... [art] became less about making a visionary artistic statement, and more about making a statement that was "counter-cultural" (the Dada movement, for example) and meant to shock the collective consciousness... what fit this qualification often garnered an artist fame in his own community and an increase in his paycheck ..."
ReplyDeleteWhy shock the "collective consciousness" that begat WW1? Why counter (well, culturally at least) any aspect of early-20th century Europe, but for a fatter paycheck?
Zanotti should have sensed something was off, perhaps vulnerable to mockery, when she typed "Dada" and "an increase[d] paycheck" in the same sentence.
In fairness, I should read on -- it'll all come together, for sure.
Art degraded starting around the Enlightenment?!?! Sure to come as news to art historians everywhere.
ReplyDeleteShe's a Conservative In Name Only. Everybody knows the degeneracy set in with Raphael.
Where news looks into YOU!
ReplyDeleteThe "it" being the operative mode here. You can't be a person--or perhaps even a human--if you're Black.
ReplyDeleteTwo-dimensional art is upsetting to her two-dimensional thinking.
ReplyDeleteApostrophes came in with the secularists and Freemasons as part of the drive to turn our attentions from the Eternal. No decent person would use one.
ReplyDeleteIs St. Rod the Dreary (patron saint of self righteous killjoys) already married? Do they take sister wives in the Eastern Orthodox Catholic church of for fuck's sake everything since Constantine has been a sign of the inherent sinfulness of humanity and you're all going to be really sorry when the apocalypse comes, but assuming our self righteous asses survive, we're not going to help because we've been telling you to wear sackcloth and ashes for 2000 years, but did you listen? no.
ReplyDelete"...if its a life, then taking the life is murder. We have no problem with that assertion..."
ReplyDeleteThis might be the perfect time for someone on our side to politely mention to Zanotti that, no, a fertilized ovum is not a baby, nor is a blastocyst a child, so she should save her outrage for when an actual person is mistreated. Like those poor, oppressed Job Creators who do so much for us in spite of having their hard-earned wealth re-distributed to the worthless... well, rest of us.
"There seems to be a degradation of the concept of art that starts around the Enlightenment."
ReplyDeleteTo my mind, this quote neatly illustrates the virulent reactionary antipathy to the Enlightment in particular and to the faculty of reason in general.
Well, we all know that the true definition of "Art" is: "Whatever looks good over my mantelpiece".
ReplyDeleteCheessa neenjah mah wongee Benghazi (farrrrttt)
ReplyDeleteAh, yes, the decadent ninja turtle.
ReplyDeletebanging out boob-bait for outlets[WAGGLES EYEBROWS]
ReplyDeleteZanotti characterizes the contest as "two unappealing candidates who are battling for the measly one-third of the electorate that hasn’t checked out completely,"On the other hand, comparably shitty turnout back in November was the Voice of the People repudiating everything Obama stands for.
ReplyDeletethough she currently lives in Chicago she really wants to move away (presumably to some conservative oasis like Fritters, Alabama, to serve as the village strategic partner)Eh, with the WSJ gig, probably New York City. That'll show 'em!
IYKWIMAITYD
ReplyDeleteHomo sapiens ruined everything for the salt-of-the-earth Cro Magnon in flyover country.
ReplyDeleteWell, yes, but you can't expect her to condemn her new bosses in her very first column.
ReplyDeleteShhh, she's being sneaky-clever and those dumb lieberals will never realize they've been tricked into outlawing abortion.
ReplyDeleteI interpreted that shot as being a signifier that the title that she wanted to go with originally, rather than American Princess (Republican, please) was Look At These Fucking Boots, Bitches.
ReplyDelete"good hair and rolled-up sleeves are in the Romney blood."
ReplyDeleteSounds like a severe clot risk to me.
That argument doesn't go too far. I like to say so what? I'm not the one going to hell, what do I care if someone somewhere decides to have an abortion? Don't you believe in free will? Why are you trying to take away my God-given right to prove I am a Godly person by choosing to obey God? Who died and made YOU God?
ReplyDeleteIt's a little incoherent but it's got a good beat and you can dance to it.
In other news, the Romneys have blood--who knew? I mean, seriously:
ReplyDeleteI can't read the Whiz-J article either, but I think it's dismissable on the basis of the lede: "Mayor Rahm Emanuel is doing something very uncharacteristic to save his flailing re-election campaign: He’s being nice." You don't fucking say?
ReplyDeleteFavorite icon, Christ Pantocrankor.
ReplyDelete"a man who has many progressive dreams and no idea how to pay for them,"
ReplyDeleteHe should offer some tax cuts. BAM! Problem solved.
Oh sure, gallons and gallons, of every type.
ReplyDeleteA Zhdanovite galaxy far, far away...
ReplyDeleteApostrophes are a decadent Enlightenment invention.
ReplyDeleteIt's a pity the WSJ keeps their opinionoids out in the field. (Though I wouldn't cough up the price of a NYC office for any of 'em, either.) The fireworks when this ray of sunshine met James Taranto would probably have been visible from orbit.
ReplyDeleteSure, I'd be happy if THAT argument were made as well. I just hate it when our side confines itself to carving out narrow exemptions to wingnut laws restricting abortion for rape, incest, or the life of the mother instead of pushing back and suggesting that Zanotti and her pals back the fuck off and get out of our faces.
ReplyDeleteThe best money can buy.
ReplyDeleteLife begins at conception and ends at parturition.
ReplyDeleteOh, the news pages are still full of news. The opinion pages, well. As the saying goes, you can't find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy in the galaxy.
ReplyDeleteHahwoo!
ReplyDeleteLife begins at conception and ends atslashing funding for prenatal care.
ReplyDelete"Geez, dude, take it down a notch."
ReplyDelete--Patrick Bateman
I'll never call it anything but The Mos Eisley Journal again...
ReplyDeleteAnd 16 Tons will be the new national Anthem...
ReplyDeleteIt's probably worth noting here that Garcia is the floor leader of Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle, who has cut the county budget at least 10% across the board and negotiated reduced pensions going forward. Whose bond just got reduced to one notch above junk? Hint: it's not the government run by the favorite of the vicious austerity junkies.*
ReplyDeleteProgressives might as well have progressive dreams and no idea how to pay for them, because when they do cut the budget, they get fuck-all for credit.
*One thing I'll say in fairness to Rahm: Daley handed him a shitshow.
Someone once pointed out that had they been born eighty-some-odd years ago, a lot of modern libertarians would have been communists. Think about what the communist ideal was: A stateless society where people benefit based on how much they contribute. Course, it never worked out that way, but neither has laissez-faire libertarianism - another thing they have in common.
ReplyDeleteHey according to the WashingComPost editorial, Rahm is the "pragmatic progressive" here. Garcia and everyone else to Rahm's left are naive purists.
ReplyDeleteExactly. So here's my favorite Dick Van Dyke Show joke:
ReplyDeleteSALLY: Rob, either you've got nerves of steel, or you have ice water in your veins.
BUDDY: Hope it's not both, or you'll end up with rusty blood!
No silly. "Art" coordinates with the drapes or yields a hefty ROI.
ReplyDeleteThis seems to have been the fergusin midel but they cut out the middleman.
ReplyDeleteYou owe me a keyboard for this^^^!
ReplyDeleteBinders full!
ReplyDeleteIf we're going to use a song about mining, I'd go with "Timothy".
ReplyDeleteIt's closer to the conservative ideal.
what fit this qualification often garnered an artist fame in his own community and an increase in his paycheck...
ReplyDeleteOh yeah, that van Gogh --- he sure did rake in the big bucks!
It started "degrading" when it stopped being propaganda for royalty and the church.
ReplyDeleteThe crux of the biscuit is the apostrophe.
ReplyDeleteThe WSJ op-ed pages were always thus. I remember reading the WSJ back in the early '80s and marveling at how the front page could be filled with stories of corporate malfeasance and the op-ed pages could be filled with editorials excusing or even praising that exact same malfeasance.
ReplyDeleteCombining "more about making a statement" with "the Dada movement" is like citing Cinerama as the apex toward which all developments in cinema were headed. Zanotti's piece is an undergrad essay barely worth its C- .
ReplyDeleteI want to make a slam book with this comment.
ReplyDeleteThat's how you can tell the real conservatives: who else is willing to carry a grudge for 40,000 years?
ReplyDeleteThat's just the way of the world. Clinton got us to budget surpluses. Bush more than quadrupled the debt and quintupled the deficit. Obama slashed spending and the deficit is actually shrinking. But it's Republicans who are the fiscal conservatives, and Democrats who are tax-n-spend liberals.
ReplyDeleteIs it a little sad that this is a better "die, you insolent scum" glare than Eddie Redmayne was able to deliver in Jupiter Rising?
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately, free will has nothing to do with sating the ego needs of assholes.
ReplyDeleteNot necessarily, since Redmayne was presumably pretending.
ReplyDeleteYou sure you're not thinking of Cheney?
ReplyDeleteOh he's got lots, too, he just doesn't bother to drain it out for storage purposes.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteWhen I was in the military, I used to enjoy pointing out to
my “comrades” how great the system was—sure the pay sucked, and there was the
whole combat thing going, but we had decent housing, medical, dental, travel,
clothing and food allowance, discounted goods and consumables in the base
exchange, and tons of other benefits provided by third-parties and available
through government guarantees and gigantic group rates. Our status was theoretically merit-based and
color/gender blind.
The general consensus was “boo-rah,” and so on. “Yeah,” I’d then go on. “This system is so
egalitarian and decent, that we should share it with civilians. Wouldn’t it be great if all Americans could
have the same basic safety net we enjoy?”
You can see where this is going…and so could they after a
few minutes. The time for the light to
go on (or off) depended on the branch I was talking to…Air Force and Navy were
usually quicker than Marines, and they were all quicker than Army.
I still don’t quite understand how some of the most vocally
jingoistic American “patriots” can suck up all that Socialist goodness but
literally give their lives to ensure no one else can have it.
"Love the fetus, hate the child." (h/t Randi Rhoades)
ReplyDeleteStandardization of spelling and punctuation was the downfall of civilization, amirite? Samuel Johnson, you decadent Alinskyite you.
ReplyDeleteChomsky always asserted that the WSJ news section was a better source than the NYT, business types needed the unvarnished reality to make solid investment decisions. The NYT was just an organ of the state.
ReplyDeletethe Romneys have blood--who knew?
ReplyDeleteYes, it is just very very very blue.
Don't you knowFree Will (not to be confused with "Free Willy") is just another term for "Free Market"?
ReplyDeleteThe Kocks themselves are not anti-abortion.
ReplyDeleteYa know... (subject changer) I was watching a youtube on the Black Death, and the narrator was going on & on about how those dumb Dark Age folk didn't realize rats & fleas were unhealthy. I thought: 700 years from now will remaining humans be shaking their heads at how WE didn't realize carbon emissions and polluting the environment with chemicals and plastics was unhealthy? (I kind of like 'disaster porn'. I think because the disaster is usually explained, except in the case of Titanic. Can't make sense of that.)
ReplyDeleteJust skyballing here, but as a WSJ reader from the early 60s on, I can tell you the wall between right-wing opinion and news reporting came tumbling noisily down right after . . . wait for it, you know it's coming, Rupert Murdoch bought the paper. Imagine! Rupert bought it and I stopped buying it. It used to be the best newspaper in America, but that's not a category any more.
ReplyDeleteI liked the WSJ in the 90s. I read the best description of the AIDs crisis and the reason a vaccine couldn't be developed that I've come across yet. But I had to remove the editorial pages before reading, as the enraged me.
ReplyDeleteStrange how that works...
ReplyDeleteI yearn to hear a Democratic candidate say "Sure we can pay for free clinics and Metro and education! Just tax the rich! They don't need all that money and WE do!"
ReplyDeleteThe scariest think I know about Obama is he hired Rahm.
ReplyDeleteHe seems to really really like the shitshow.
ReplyDeleteVarious fees are already like that. It's pretty darn expensive to be poor (as paradoxical as that sounds.)
ReplyDeleteThe findings from that Ferguson Report weren't all that surprising, really. People at the bottom of society there were paying all kinds of weird fees. How many rich people ever have to pay for a "manner of walking" violation?
If the Company Store wants MY soul, they'll have to come and take it.
ReplyDeleteIt's because they're Anti-Social Socialists.
ReplyDeleteYou know what's most maddening about that? It's that anyone who could do basic math could see, well before the 2000 election, that Bush's plan to cut taxes & increase military spending were going to immediately put us back into deficits. I can't remember the number he gave, but it was a specific number & I did the calculations at the time. NO ONE in the media ever pointed it out; it was treated as "Bush says x, Gore says y," not "if you do the math with the actual numbers Bush has stated, we're going to be spending $100 - $200 billion more per year than we're taking in and it's going to grow the debt." Instead they went with "Bush says 2 + 2 = 5; Gore claims that 2 + 2 = 4."
ReplyDeleteI thought: 700 years from now will remaining humans be shaking their heads at how WE didn't realize carbon emissions and polluting the environment with chemicals and plastics was unhealthy?
ReplyDeleteThere's an old story about Wittgenstein standing on the walls of Vienna watching the sun rise with one of his students. The student says, "Oh, those ancient people were so stupid to think the sun revolves around the Earth.
To which Wittgenstein replied, "True. But I wonder what it would look like if the sun did revolve around the Earth?"
The point here being that your view of things is predicated on what you know. If you didn't know (or don't want to know) about climate change and pollution . . .
I think Krugman was pointing this out. That's how he earned being called "shrill" by the rest of the media.
ReplyDeleteOh, it's terribly expensive to be poor. In America, we view the poor as economic prey. From payday loans to rent-to-own to court systems that stack up the fines for not paying fines, we make damn sure the poor stay poor.
ReplyDeleteWalMart is the designated Company Store, and while they may not have managed to yet snatch your soul, they've been hugely successful in reaching into your pocket whether you shop with them or not. We all pick up the tab for their employment model of wage slavery, to the tune of about $22 per year for every man, woman, and child in the US. Because WalMart is a profitable company, essentially what this means is you and I and everyone else ponies up $22 per year so each of the six Walton heirs can increase their multi-billion fortunes by $1 billion per year, instead of the puny half billion increase they'd have to struggle by on if they paid their workers instead of making us pick up the tab.
ReplyDeleteThat said, its not as though making something illegal necessarily makes it punishable.
ReplyDeleteYeah, she's gonna fit right in on Wall Street.
Appropriate:
ReplyDeleteInstead they went with "Bush says 2 + 2 = 5; Gore claims that 2 + 2 = 4."More like, "Bush touts arithmetic improvements; earthtoned Gore sighs like poopyhead."
ReplyDeleteFeature, not bug.
ReplyDeleteThat's true. The Kochs just actively work to prevent anyone non-rich from having access to one.
ReplyDeleteShe got sick of being chained to Jonah's dais.
ReplyDeleteIs that what he's calling it these days
its not as though making something illegal necessarily makes it
ReplyDeletepunishable.
Its a long-standing tradition
Know Your Rights
Murder is a crime
Unless it was done
By a policeman or aristocrat
Which could lead to dancing.
ReplyDeleteI'm still trying to figure out "stretch pants ladies." Could somebody help me out here?
ReplyDeleteHe said he'd do literally anything for pizza. And proved it.
ReplyDeleteThat oughta be against the law.
ReplyDeleteThe germ theory of disease is a conspiracy invented by those fatcats at Big Antiseptic. The bubonic plague was mostly caused by people eating too much wheat gluten and toxins produced by chemicals used in middle age blacksmithing.
ReplyDeleteI attend the church of ladies and I'm as puzzled as you.
ReplyDeleteChilled, on ice, with a splash of Worcestershire and some celery salt, for brunch. (No booze, they're Mormons!)
ReplyDeleteApropos of nothing but your avatar, please note this: http://youtu.be/oVOq3eHFQn0
ReplyDeleteLadies who wear yoga pants or other comfortable garments to church, because they want to be there, instead of the sackcloth and ashes and/or wimple-and-chastity-belt as per her "if I were queen of the world" idea.
ReplyDeleteConservative Princess Are there any other kind?
ReplyDeleteBack in Exodus 21, if you killed somebody by mistake, you could self exile to designated cities.
ReplyDeleteSo, being biblical purists, they could send abortionists to Levittown. Why? Numbers 5 - The sons of Levi handle abortions:
23 “‘The priest is to write these curses on a scroll and then wash them off into the bitter water. 24 He shall make the woman drink the bitter water that brings a curse, and this water that brings a curse and causes bitter suffering will enter her. 25 The priest is to take from her hands the grain offering for jealousy, wave it before the Lord and bring it to the altar. 26 The priest is then to take a handful of the grain offering as a memorial[e] offering and burn it on the altar; after that, he is to have the woman drink the water. 27 If she has made herself impure and been unfaithful to her husband, this will be the result: When she is made to drink the water that brings a curse and causes bitter suffering, it will enter her, her abdomen will swell and her womb will miscarry, and she will become a curse. 28 If, however, the woman has not made herself impure, but is clean, she will be cleared of guilt and will be able to have children.
Well, yes, the Titanic disaster can be explained, although it does require an alternative history.
ReplyDeleteBy the way you might think it would be hard to make comedy out of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood, but The Toast managed it.
ReplyDeleteI still don’t quite understand how some of the most vocally jingoistic
ReplyDeleteAmerican “patriots” can suck up all that Socialist goodness but
literally give their lives to ensure no one else can have it.
Isn't it just because they're sure THEY earned it/worked hard for it, while lazy greedy mooching layabouts in "certain segments of society" just want a handout? Every conservative I've ever met will bust out Astonishing Tales of Welfare within minutes.
That's because for Republicans "deficit" and "spending" don't mean deficit and spending. They mean welfare.
ReplyDeleteAnd on top of everything else, _visionary_ artistic statements are per se countercultural. That's kind of the whole point of Romanticism. Which conservatives hated.
ReplyDeleteSo, this is an uplifting story of what it means to pay one's conservative dues and reach the pinnacle of whackjobbery, the WSJ editorial pages.
ReplyDeleteYou, too, can achieve fame and fortune by spending a lifetime writing ahistorical, tendentious and tedious blather.
But, sadly and forlornly, you're still just one of Ruprecht Murdoch's toadies. Fer chrissakes, what price fame, I ask you? Is this the American Dream? Is this all there is? Oh, Emily, Emily, abandon this endeavor before the leaden ennui engulfs you, before you succumb to gin lime rickeys before lunchtime and afternoons spent waiting for magic dolphins to lift you onto their backs and transport you to Meet the Press' green room.
Reject this empty masquerade of feigned intellectual competence. Disappear into the back pages of The Daily Caller, of BigDeadBreitbart. Do it for the nation. Do it for yourself.
Beyond creepy! And that, presumably, is me! Actually, IRL I'd love to go to moominworld. But I wouldn't choose snufkin to marry me. The guy's a total commitment phobe.
ReplyDeleteNo thanks!
ReplyDeleteThankee kindly. Now I get it.
ReplyDeleteI want to visit a homeopathic practitioner with this comment.
ReplyDeleteI admit that I'm biased, but I've just got to believe that there's more to it than that.... isn't there?
ReplyDeleteYes, and they also see "tax cuts" as "increased revenue."
ReplyDeleteSeriously, that's what they say.
...for "shoppligations"
ReplyDeleteWell to be fair, they earn the good stuff because we authorize them to blow shit up and kill people on our behalf. Which, come to think of it, is yet another perk.
ReplyDeleteI want to hang out with this comment in a seedy den in London, while a young woman in Turkish pajamas brings us glass after glass of absinthe.
ReplyDeleteWell of course. If the poors don't have babies and raise them in squalor, where will the next generation of wage slaves come from?
ReplyDeleteStarting a new art movement would require being creative and also doing something instead of just bitching. She's doubly out.
ReplyDeleteDamn, I always thought it was "When in doubt, whip it out." That explains all the weird looks I've been getting at work.
ReplyDeletemore about making a statement that was "counter-cultural" (the Dada
ReplyDeletemovement, for example) and meant to shock the collective consciousness
E. M. Zanotti has learned from Art's example and has no intention of repeating the "surprise-the-audience" mistake.
Yes, for people who were so virulently anti-"old" Europe just 10 short years ago, the rightwing is all about emulating the ancien regime.
ReplyDeleteMock the Painter of Light if you will, but realize that Miro never knew the satisfaction of selling his art out of a strip mall.
ReplyDeleteBut you can bet she reveres the Founding Fathers and considers herself a patriot and A True American.
ReplyDelete"Locke?
What a crock!"
You won't be laughing so hard when she shows up on Morning Joe or Meet the Press.
ReplyDeleteI think that's pretty much it. The fact that most of the "moochers" these people have in mind are actually working for a living doesn't really matter, nor does the fact that.there probably is enough money awash in this society to pay for full-on socialized medicine for every man, woman and child, and most of the undocumented immigrants, too (who also pay plenty in taxes). Which would make this place a nicer place to live in.
ReplyDelete"Look, Mom, no Mexicans in the emergency room!"