Angelina Jolie wants us to talk about rape, but not in the Western-centric, man-blaming, feminist-professor way of the chattering classes.
She would like us to move beyond insular #YesAllWomen Twitter outrage to a global perspective with a broader, wiser understanding of the evils of human nature and the ability to overcome that evil with good.
Jolie stepped into this conversation way back in 2009 when she agreed to lend her considerable star power to a movie that explored rape in the context of a children’s story.
That movie became “Maleficent”...OK, how about Jersey Boys?
UPDATE. Commenter D Johnston points us to Cusey's other essay on Maleficent, in which she denounces morally demented movies that "make the case that the villain is simply misunderstood" and "argue that the euro-centric, patriarchal, cisnormative, everything-normative world has gone crazy and the sane ones are those who buck the system" -- movies like (I am not joking) Shrek.
Finally, someone with the courage to talk about rape without all that "man-blaming." Come on, ladies, let's not get hung up on who's penis violated who now.
ReplyDeleteKelsey Grammer wants us to talk about lynching, but not in the Confederate-centric, white-blaming, civil rights professor way of the chattering classes.
ReplyDeleteFrom Bambi to The Lion King to this -- that Disney crew sure knows how to traumatize little kids.
ReplyDeleteOK, how about Jersey Boys?
ReplyDeleteVictor Davis Hanson wants to spend 1,300 words telling you that Frankie Valli had a level of integrity and class that Jay-Z totally lacks. Maybe just stay in and check what's on Netflix.
I guess that, for the rightwingnuts, rape is about to become a "lifestyle choice" for women. I expect that we'll soon have Jeff Foxworthy or that racist asshole with the ventriloquist dummies doing some routine about how to accessorize properly for rape.
ReplyDeleteThe awful part is that the above isn't the worst bit in the article. This is:
ReplyDeleteFor Jolie, the story of rape does not end at the violation nor at fighting back. She goes further. “Maleficent” baffles victim-centric American feminists because instead of merely a story of victimhood or vengeance, it goes beyond both to become a story of rising above abuse and choosing to be better.
You know what? I'm not touching this one. Nope, not me, not saying anything about this statement arguing that the real problem with rape is the victims. I'm just going to leave it here, in a place well away from the walls and anything breakable, and let someone else unpack and address it.
Western women have what many women around the world do not: Tools to
ReplyDeletefight back. That’s hardly the word from the #YesAllWomen crowd.
Pff, these jerky feminists, with their civilization that's too advanced, smugly demanding there be no rape! Why don't they ever tweet about how great it is to have universally noble cops and problem-solving rape kits?? Ungrateful bitches!
Look, Western civilization is perfect as is. But it's also fragile. And if these bitches try to make it perfecter by reducing rape -- angrily! -- then we will topple, as we will have committed civilization's gravest sin: Failure to accept a certain amount of rape while tweeting heartfelt appreciation for how it could be worse.
I haven't seen Maleficent, but didn't the title character go on to be a thundering asshole to a lot of innocent people? How is an elaborate revenge plot that primarily targets an infant a case of rising above abuse and choosing to be better than one's rapist?
ReplyDeleteI mean, that paragraph is obviously horrific in its implications, but the reasoning being employed is just bizarre.
ReplyDeleteIt's almost like we're dealing with a person who has no idea that other people have interior lives more complicated than a Hallmark card.
ReplyDeleteI imagine Cusey drawing a flow chart to figure out what it's like to be a human being. Inside a square: "A woman suffers a violent, gender-based attack." Three arrows point discrete ways out. Arrow 1: "Is she whining forlornly?" Arrow 2: "Is she plotting evil revenge?" Arrow 3: "Is she rising above it to be a better person?" Cusey sits back from the chart she just drew, smiling proudly -- she has really nailed it, the human experience.
Oh, well that's in a different article written by the same author:
ReplyDeleteShe repents of her curse. She tries to change it, desperately tries to undo it. Finding the damage irrevocable, Maleficent feels the weight of her evil choice. Only when she confesses her guilt, sincerely apologizes, and promises to spend her life trying to make up for it, do things change.
I'm not touching this one, either - mostly because the only explanation I can find that unites these two statements makes me want to vomit.
If you.......you might be a rapist.
ReplyDeleteBTW, the point of #yesallwomen is to talk about shit that happens to all women...in order to achieve what one might say is a "global perspective with a broader, wiser understanding of the evils of human nature..." Hence #yesALLwomen.
ReplyDeleteSheesh.
but not in the Western-centric, man-blaming, feminist-professor way of the chattering classes
ReplyDeleteAdjective, adjective, adverb ,adjective, adjective, adjective verb noun. ADJECTIVE, adjective,adjective, adjective, verb, ADJECTIVE verb noun! Adjective, ADJECTIVE , adjective, adverb, adjective, adjective,ADJECTIVE , adjective, adjective noun!!!!
ADJECTIVE, ADJECTIVE, ADJECTIVE, ADJECTIVE, ADJECTIVE, ADJECTIVE!!!!
NOUN!!! verb.
It's the grammatical version of mansplained anti-rape advice. Any noun that goes out by itself deserves what it gets.
Oh, there's an even better example in the other article she wrote about Maleficent - yes, two of them in a row. Anyway, here it is:
ReplyDeleteThose stories make the case that the villain is simply misunderstood. They argue that the euro-centric, patriarchal, cisnormative, everything-normative world has gone crazy and the sane ones are those who buck the system.
That sentence is about Shrek, by the way.
Ah I see. So basically, "slutty sluts, er idiot girls who don't know what rape is er...victims of sexual assault should spend their whole lives feeling guilty and miserable for trying to find justice. Rather, they should "rise above" their attackers' crimes, apologize for their attackers' crimes, and do good works to make up for the fact that they were attacked.
ReplyDeleteCan someone please tell me why conservatives hate women so much?
I used to be in favour of the rights of women but since the SCUM Manifesto I only listen to Ted Nugent records.
ReplyDeleteLook. Just because Western women have the tools to fight back doesn't mean they're allowed to use them.
ReplyDeleteOffhand I would say that I'd met more feminists by the time I was three months old than Rebecca Cusey has to this day.
ReplyDeleteHe's a Latinist? He could explain why Valli is the plural of Valium.
ReplyDeleteAt the very least the women should pay the men compensation for sperm-jacking them.
ReplyDeleteMy only response is that the claim the film "baffles victim-centric American feminists" reminds me of the old saw, "If you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit." On a few different levels.
ReplyDeleteIsn't exactly what George Will wrote last week? That there is a cachet to be obtained on campuses by being sexually assaulted?
ReplyDeletethe other article she wrote about Maleficent - yes, two of them in a row
ReplyDeleteWell, now we know that Jolie's press agent isn't too particular about where he plants stories.
Ah, well, we all know that the only real victims are conservatives. Everyone else is just an unfit usurper to the title.
ReplyDeleteSo she's arguing that "patriarchal" and "cisnormative" mean exactly the same thing. If you happen to be a heterosexual, that makes you an advocate of male supremacy. And the corollary, I guess, is that if you're not an advocate of male supremacy, then you must be (gasp!) -- oh, the hell with it, why should I waste time trying to figure out what her delusions mean when I can just fall back on my favorite Molly Ivins quote, "Sheesh, what an asshole."
ReplyDeleteGeo-caching was a lot easier in my day.
ReplyDeleteThey argue that the euro-centric, patriarchal, cisnormative,
ReplyDeleteeverything-normative world has gone crazy and the sane ones are those
who buck the system.Goodness me. Someone needs to get her started on "Where the Wild Things Are".
You'd probably learned more from them at three months, as well.
ReplyDeleteNobody tell her about "I Spit on your Grave," 'kay?
ReplyDeleteHey, Boys will be Boys, what're ya gonna do? Gotta love the big lugs. After a hard day ruling the world, some just need to let off a little steam.
ReplyDeleteWomen on the other hand, choose to complain instead of being good examples. Jeez, how are men supposed to learn good behavior?
It just makes sense. I mean, we've been punishing "rapists" through the centuries with everything from chopping off dicks to hard time in prison, even death at times, and there are still rapes!!! Obviously, a little shame from being forgiven will set things straight.
Holy (non-consensual) Fuck! What a simple-minded worldview to conflate personal development and healing with social reform.
Well, poverty is already a lifestyle choice that women make, according to certain conservatoids, when they "select into Divorce," so I'm guessing Yes.
ReplyDeleteOne might say that a foundation of Western male culture is the revenge motif, and not in an ironic-protagonist-learns-that-revenge-makes-things-worse kinda way, but in a high-body-count-with-ingenious-methods-of-torture-and-death kinda way.
ReplyDeleteBut, women should know that revenge is for men, silly ninnies.
So here's what happened. She liked the movie and wants to talk about it, but in order to do that, Cluesey must first Conservatize the subject into acceptability and the big hurdle here is the title character is played by a hawt, liberal woman who keeps adopting brown babies. Noting less than "Look fellas, she doesn't blame men for rape!" would do.
ReplyDeleteIsn't that how all delusional personalities protect their egos when consuming pop culture?
ReplyDeleteThere aren't enough upvotes in the world for this comment.
ReplyDeleteObligatory.
ReplyDelete"Western women have what many women around the world do not: Tools to fight back. That’s hardly the word from the #YesAllWomen crowd."
ReplyDeleteI'm gonna go out on a limb here and venture a guess that Cusey is talking about Second Amendment Tools"...
I haven't seen Maleficent, but didn't the title character go on to be a thundering asshole to a lot of innocent people?
ReplyDeleteThis pretty much encapsulates conservative life philosophy. How long before this movie is hailed as yet another title deserving of top billing at the Conservative Moronoplex?
Careful, she might start channeling Hanna Rosin.
ReplyDeleteFrom Wikipedia, so SPOILERS:
ReplyDeleteAn elderly woman narrates and tells the story of Maleficent, a very strong and powerful fairy living in the Moors, a magical realm bordering a human kingdom. As a young girl, she meets and falls in love with a human peasant boy named Stefan whose mutual romantic love and affections for Maleficent is overshadowed by his ambition to become king. As they grow older, Stefan stops seeing Maleficent. After Maleficent defeats the current king in battle when he attempts to invade the Moors, he offers to name whoever kills her his successor. Stefan overhears this and visits Maleficent at night, drugs her and attempts to kill her but cannot bring himself to do so. Instead he burns her wings off with iron, a lethal substance to fairies, and presents them to the king as proof of her death.
A lot of reviewers have noticed this looks like rape, and Jolie said the undertones were intentional. Of course, that means for her argument Cusey is required to accept the premise that being drugged and assaulted by someone you know is rape, which... I thought that was a liberal heresy at this point.
I suspect that Frozen would have played better with conservatives if they hadn't gotten caught up in the supposed lesbian context. (This despite the fact that the two women love each other as, y'know, sisters. And hey, I'm not trying to shame anyone's kinks here, just going out on a limb and guessing that that's not where Disney was going with that one.)
ReplyDeleteI mean, the whole "Let It Go (Even If It Fucks Over Those Latte-Sipping Urbanites)" number should suit them pretty well.
If you've ever uttered the phrase, "She didn't say no," you might be a rapist.
ReplyDeleteIf you think the phrase, "Once you pop, you can't stop," applies to more than just Pringles, you might be a rapist.
No, I really think she means we're allowed to Tweet about it, therefore Ding Dong Rape Culture is dead in America.
ReplyDeleteWhen Frankie Valli sang "I'd turn those sad rags into glad rags if I could", he revealed himself as just another liberal do-gooder encouraging dependency.
ReplyDeleteThey don't really understand the difference between the author and the protagonist, either, but that's likely because they are themselves probably incapable of writing a protagonist who doesn't share their conservative worldview.
ReplyDeleteIf we just shift the blame to vague "evils of human nature," we don't have to fix any social problems! Works out great for the people at the top of the existing social order, and really, who else matters?
ReplyDeleteMakes sense to me! Libertarians and their wealthy benefactors already ascribe the venal depravities of business to the great amoral "Market." $4/ hour wages? Coal miners trapped in a collapsing mine? Slavery? It is the Will of the Market! Like Galactus, it is a force of nature only with neckbearded randroids as its herald instead of The Silver Surfer.
ReplyDeleteDon't forget the granddaddy of 'em all for scary Disney movies: Darby O'Gill and the Little People.
ReplyDeleteGiven how bad they seem to be at grasping the concepts of "fiction", "entertainment", and "character motivation", it's not really a surprise. But we are talking about people who have such stunted imaginations they can't even imagine someone with more imagination.
ReplyDeleteSlightly OT, but didn't they say the same thing about Matthew Sheppard basically causing his own death by coming on to three homophobic morons?
ReplyDeleteIf you were wondering what sort of twisted thinking led some Irish nuns to think that shoveling hundreds of infants into an unmarked grave was a good idea, Ms. Cusey seems glad to provide a fresh new example.
ReplyDelete“Maleficent” baffles victim-centric American feminists because instead of merely a story of victimhood or vengeance, it goes beyond both to become a story of rising above abuse and choosing to be better.
ReplyDeleteNext up: Hansel and Gretel and the importance of dieting.
tools to fight back
ReplyDeleteYes! We have the right to remain silent. We have the right to a District Attorney (if we can get one to believe us) (and of course if we haven't died as a result of the attack or been honor-killed). We have the right to have our clothing choices and personal lives very carefully and publicly examined, by the rapist's attorney and the press, because everyone knows short skirts cause involuntary erections and emit magnetic fields that pull helpless penises across rooms, sometimes in groups, even when their owners try to resist by punching the skirt-wearer or holding her down. And everyone knows any previous sex we might have had weeks, months, or even years ago only contributes to the omnipotence of our penis-controlling magnetic fields.
"Invading the Moors" is clearly a reference to Benghazi.
ReplyDeleteConservatives have always had a major problem understanding the concept of "consent" when it comes to women. But when your mental construct of the world is such that women have (and cannot have) agency, then it becomes not just easy but mandatory to blame women for being victims.
ReplyDeleteThus, women are not able to make choices about, say, abortion because they are passive vessels. And to enforce this view, we will force women to undergo unnecessary, intrusive, and shaming procedures without their consent before we let them exercise control over their own bodies. With this as background, is it any wonder why rape is the woman's fault?
How come nobody gives Whittaker Chambers the credit he deserves? I'm re-reading Tanenhaus' biography of Chambers.
ReplyDeleteChambers had the entire right-wing schtick worked out, and little has changed since he set the mode.
My God, what would conservatives think of my methods? I'm into a thing called 'continuous consent' which means that I only accept consent for the present level of intimacy ('may I pat your little hand?' 'How's about a kiss, Sugar?') and new consent must be sought for each escalation of intimacy ('C'mon, Mama, throw a blanket on me, pretty please' )
ReplyDeleteOh, who am I trying to fool. I only do it like that cause it's more fun.
You know what I think? I think CGI does more damage to kids body-image (especially girls) than a whole legion of trussed up Hollywood bimbos ever did.
ReplyDeleteI'm still surprised there wasn't more pants-shitting over "no right, no wrong, no rules for me."
ReplyDeleteSome years back, there was a write-up on TPM about some heavy-hitter conservative who was being sued for divorce. One of his wife's complaints was that he repeatedly raped her anally. This included forcing himself into her while she was sleeping and while she was drunk.
ReplyDeleteI guess forcible anal rape against someone you nominally love and care about is just A-Okay. Not like gay marriage which must be icky because of its consensual nature.
You can also see a doctor following your rape, who may or may not supply you with the means to prevent your becoming pregnant as a result of the rape, because Life.
ReplyDeleteThe sane ones buck the system. The nuns refused to accept the deus-normative indoctrination that every life had value.
ReplyDeleteYep--they're likely to be just that flip about it. So sad to have to share a planet with these people.
ReplyDelete"We must send a message around the world that there is no disgrace in
ReplyDeletebeing a survivor of sexual violence—that the shame is on the
aggressor…We need to shatter that impunity and make justice the norm,
not the exception, for these crimes,” Jolie said."
I can actually get behind this sentiment. Rape in war zones has always been about soldiers asserting their dominance and the losing societies turning their shame at losing inward on to the women who have been raped. In this context, it IS society's job to not stigmatize the victims, and to make sure they have a way back in to society as whole people. My problem with Cusey, to the extent that I can even decipher what the hell she's trying to say, is that she sounds like she wants to castigate the feminists in her head for wanting to turn rape sufferers into helpless victims, which I have NEVER heard a true feminist say, while taking the responsibilities that men have to not be total dickheaded toads completely out of the equation and putting the responsibility for openness and forgiveness completely on the victims. And I have no idea what she was trying to convey with this bit of snarky assholishness: "That message is increasingly the Gospel According to Saint Angie: Evil is complicated and must be stopped, but can only be overcome by good." I guess I should be happy to see that "The Federalist" has instituted a word salad bar.
Not ALL Maleficients!
ReplyDeleteSean Connery's finest role!
ReplyDeleteThanks for explaining. I was thinking I must have seen the TV edit of Shrek with all the parts that upended cisnormativity cut for time constraints.
ReplyDelete[Snaps fingers!]
ReplyDeleteSay you know what? We should thank them for being assholes because that gives us a chance to accumulate grace by forgiving them!
Which is even odder because that would mean the antagonist is written by someone else?
ReplyDeleteI'm not saying they don't think this way, just that there are new facets to their ruby of stupidity every time you look at it.
"Honey, I shrank my brain."
ReplyDeleteWait, Dunham's a racist? I mean, it's not like I liked him to begin with, but, still a surprise to me.
ReplyDeleteThat movie became “Maleficent”...
ReplyDeleteAnd now you know... the end of the story.
But they just better not fire into the ceiling!
ReplyDeleteWell I did have a functioning nervous system.
ReplyDeleteI this regard, I suppose I am unredeemable.
ReplyDeleteI'd rather go to hell.
Well that really appealed to the Libertarian faction.
ReplyDelete