Tuesday, January 07, 2014

IDENTITY POLITICS.

John J. Miller, the genius who gave us The 50 Greatest Conservative Rock Songs, today informs us,
Google honors a conservative today: Zora Neale Hurston.
Well, Hurston was against Brown v. Board of Education, so I guess they have something in common at that.

It's nice to see them celebrating a black person who isn't insane. But it's sad that politics is all that can animate them to do so. In one of the supporting documents for Miller's case, John McWhorter writes:
Hurston’s modern fan base doesn’t know quite what to do with all this. “I think we are better off if we think of Zora Neale Hurston as an artist, period—rather than as the artist/politician most black writers have been required to be,” [Alice] Walker writes... Sure -- but if Hurston had been more inclined to sing about what happens to a raisin in the sun, one suspects that Walker would have had no trouble celebrating her as an “artist/politician.”
Really? I guess McWhorter so judges because he figures everyone else must be like him, counting artists like captured checkers for their cause. But we haven't all been made into Zhdanovites yet.

UPDATE. Commenter D. Johnston dipped into the support docs and found "in a nutshell, McWhorter's case is based around the fact that Hurston didn't believe that black people should take credit for things other, unrelated black people did. See? She rejected identity politics!" Supporting a policy is a political decision, emotions and behavior are not. I don't think being self-sufficient is any guarantee of how you'll vote. I've spent my whole life working in the private sector, yet I'm far more liberal than anyone on wingnut welfare.

47 comments:

  1. So I went over and read those links, because...well, I was curious. When conservatives try and claim historical figures for their own, it's usually masturbation, and the fun part is watching the rhetorical tricks they come up with trying to call it art. In a nutshell, McWhorter's case is based around the fact that Hurston didn't believe that black people should take credit for things other, unrelated black people did. See? She rejected identity politics!


    Perhaps I'm the only person who sees some irony in claiming that a woman was conservative for not taking ex post facto credit, in a conservative column that's taking ex post facto credit. Then again, this is not a group widely known for their self-awareness.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Self-awareness is a commie plot, ya hippie.
    ~

    ReplyDelete
  3. coozledad12:28 PM

    Self- awareness takes all the mystery out of fapping..

    ReplyDelete
  4. Jay B.1:12 PM

    McWhorter, who is a far more interesting thinker than Miller -- but is still idiotically wrong here -- starts with the assertion that she's every bit a Clarence Thomas conservative, only to then first gut his own assertion by showing how she hated Jim Crow and thought that Anglo-Saxons were racist (but liked Booker T. Washington, at least a preacher in a story she wrote did! And was self-reliant! Which is so different than Richard Wright (who didn't care much for Hurston's writing), who probably hated Washington yet also thought Jim Crow was wrong, hated white racism and was self-reliant to an equally impressive degree)) and then digressed into the fact that she wasn't a churchgoer, eventually rejected Christianity for a creole Voodoo and, in the end, was a complicated person who was a great writer. That alone puts her leagues beyond an asshole like Thomas, who isn't in any way a thinker and is so filled with obvious self-loathing and invective, he seeks to pull up the ladder behind him.


    Once again, I don't know where the gotcha is here, but it's telling how quickly and resolutely she's become a beacon for those who need their politics vindicated by artists, while loathing the arts overall for being too liberal.

    ReplyDelete
  5. M. Krebs1:15 PM

    I'll bet that they could make a conservative out of Malcolm X if they tried.

    ReplyDelete
  6. In a nutshell, McWhorter's case is based around the fact that Hurston didn't believe that black people should take credit for things other, unrelated black people did. See? She rejected identity politics!


    It's also a repudiation of the Usurper's "Yes we can!"

    ReplyDelete
  7. Another Kiwi2:02 PM

    Don't you mean refudiation?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Another Kiwi2:06 PM

    Over at Big Dead Breitbart I expressed the view that their constant rewriting of history is a playground response and stems from them wanting to belong to the "cool kids' and this stemmed from the barrenness of their worthless ideology. Of course I was blocked, because freedom. It is just like the Mormons and their post-living baptisms

    ReplyDelete
  9. whetstone3:19 PM

    OT, but alicuratti will take note: McMegan's book is nigh. I enjoyed this part:

    "McArdle argues that America is unique in its willingness to let people
    and companies fail, but also in its determination to let them pick up
    after the fall
    ."


    That's a nice way of putting it. I look forward to the insights from "turnaround experts" and "bankruptcy judges."

    ReplyDelete
  10. Derelict3:20 PM

    Someone needs to introduce our McMegan to the term "undischargeable debt.:

    ReplyDelete
  11. whetstone3:22 PM

    Well, the fact that the debt is undischargable only speaks to America's thoughtful and downright moving determination to "let" people pick up after financial devastation.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Conservatives need to relax. There are plenty of great conservative artists: Eliot, Pound, Mamet... um, Michael J. Nelson... I mean, I'm sure there are more, but I don't know most artists' politics off the top of my head because by and large I don't care.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Gromet3:26 PM

    It seems to have escaped McWhorter (I didn't read his whole thing though) that just because Hurston wanted Taft for president in 1952 doesn't mean she'd be on Fox supporting McCain in 2008. Voting Republican doesn't mean the same thing 56 years later, and specifically Wikipedia sez she disliked Truman not because he was too liberal but because he dropped the atomic bomb. Maybe that repelled her from the Dems and war hero Ike? I dunno, but I do know Taft '52 doesn't automatically mean McCain '08 is her man. Who cares? Let's not wonder who Dickens would have voted for in 1972* or Hawthorne in 2000, either.

    *Assuming illegal registration via ACORN.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Yep, we sure did stand by and let all the banks who had made themselves insolvent through shitty investments circa 2007 fail. Injecting hundreds of billions of dollars into them in an attempt to prop them up would've been downright un-American!

    ReplyDelete
  15. ohioanseverywhere3:38 PM

    There's a strong case for considering Hurston as a conservative thinker - far stronger than the case for considering"Rock the Casbah" as a conservative song. McWhorter's essay plays up Hurston's differences with positivist and modernist (what might, if the word had less ideological baggage, be called "progressive") views of African American and African art and culture in favor of a traditionalist reading. That a strong conservative streak ran through Hurston's though is not a controversial position in African American intellectual history and McWhorter fleshes out this history fairly well.


    When McWhorter strays into "How Zora would live today", Miller's confounds and compounds 100 years of history to equate a traditionalist challenge to the high-modernist aesthetics of the Harlem Renaissance with today's left/right divide today.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Gromet3:41 PM

    Well, not to nitpick: The Community Reinvestment Act didn't come along till 1977 (wikipedia tells me) but the Republican Southern Strategy worked (1968) as a response to the Dems ramming the VRA down our throats in 1965. Still, your point stands: The Dems gave us the CRA, the Repubs gave us the SS, and both happened after Hurston preferred Taft and died.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Derelict3:58 PM

    Maybe something about rich and poor alike being barred from sleeping under bridges . . .

    ReplyDelete
  18. This makes so much sense I figure you just cribbed it from one of them, didn't you?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Well, I meant the Civil Rights Act, so...

    ReplyDelete
  20. They crave recognition like a new vampire craves sight of himself in a mirror. All joking aside it is because they are, definitionally, authoritarians--authoritarian followers and authoritarian leaders--and both types need to feel part of a dominant (authoritative) social order and majority. All the googledoodles must belong to them. All the public figures of note. All the top ten musical choices. And the romance novelette category of Harlequin books for that matter. Everything must belong to them and celebrate them or they fear that they have ceased to exist.

    ReplyDelete
  21. That's the best, most succinct explanation of this bizarre wingnut trend I've ever seen.

    ReplyDelete
  22. BigHank535:12 PM

    Well, you know, it's okay for people to fail. But not banks. Banks are special, and so are the debts that they are owed. They're so special we should ignore it if they break the law. And if that means that more people need to sleep in their cars, Megan is sure it will be an invaluable learning experience for them.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Skree!! Skree!! Typical! Google commies once again honor a fellow traveller because 1st-amendment-shredding Obama sharia law shoving Hitler armies down our patriot throats! Blarghh!!Oh look. Google honored a conservative today.

    ReplyDelete
  24. M. Krebs6:04 PM

    I wonder if she attempts to rationalize how executives walk away with millions even when they fail. It's funny how corporations can go bankrupt while no one takes a loss except their creditors and shareholders.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Derelict6:26 PM

    Well, Megan sez we should not only embrace failure, we should give it a blowjob, too--provided it's a failure involved a minimum of eight figures. If not, well, here: Enjoy getting jerked off by the invisible hand.

    ReplyDelete
  26. TGuerrant6:27 PM

    And Thomas Kinkade, Painter of Kitsch

    ReplyDelete
  27. satch6:55 PM

    "...but also in its determination to let them pick up
    after the fall."

    So by Megan's logic, both Thomas Wayne and Alfred the Butler were conservative, as in:

    youtube.com/watch?v=kTWjtnKv4vE

    ReplyDelete
  28. satch6:59 PM

    But in a really twisted, "If you don't love me, you're a stupid librul bitch" kind of way...

    ReplyDelete
  29. lawguy7:08 PM

    Do fascists count as conservative?

    ReplyDelete
  30. Corporations aren't people, my friend!

    ReplyDelete
  31. If it weren't for the fact that right-wing think tanks tried to blame the Great Recession on the Community Reinvestment Act, we could all use C.R.A. for the Civil Rights Act without danger of ambiguity.
    ~

    ReplyDelete
  32. Permission to Suck!

    ReplyDelete
  33. There's got to be a "Their Eyes Were Watching Fox and Friends" joke in here somewhere...

    ReplyDelete
  34. Gromet9:56 PM

    I'm sure this contributed to my confusion. In 2009 a conservative family member vehemently explained to me that the Great Recession was the fault of Jimmy Carter (for signing the Comm R. Act) and Clinton (for expanding it). Obama didn't start the recession, admittedly, but he was making it worse. Escaping blame (via magic?) were all Republican presidents between those guys. I had no persuasive reply.

    ReplyDelete
  35. FDRliberal10:03 PM

    "I don't think being self-sufficient is any guarantee of how you'll vote. I've spent my whole life working in the private sector, yet I'm far more liberal than anyone on wingnut welfare."


    Exactly. This silly idea, that the self-sufficient always vote for conservatives, is spouted by the Tea People constantly. Self sufficiency is a very nice trait to have but its independent of political identity and is certainly not a feasible system of govt as libertarians would like us to believe.

    ReplyDelete
  36. FDRliberal10:06 PM

    Lol. Yes the Tea Hordes on the Internets generally get themselves whipped up into frothing frenzy over the All Important Google Doodles.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Jeffrey_Kramer10:19 PM

    What did they do before Google? Pour over TV Guide so they could pull a triumphant 'gotcha!' when liberal CBS was showing classic Western movies by the conservative John Ford?

    ReplyDelete
  38. CĂ©line and Yukio Mishima, though I rather think they would both view today's wingnuts with bemused contempt.

    ReplyDelete
  39. JennOfArk12:02 AM

    -- but if Hurston had been more inclined to sing about what happens to a raisin in the sun,



    I'm pretty sure that would have made her a member of the Violent Femmes.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Meanie-meanie, tickle a person12:19 AM

    They crave recognition like a new vampire craves sight of himself in a
    mirror.


    And with about as much chance, outside of their extended dysfunctional family.

    because they are, definitionally,
    authoritarians


    And like all security-obsessives, horribly insecure. I don't know which was worse, the scaredy-pants Republicans who freaked after 9/11, or the craven Democrats who fell in step with 'em.

    ReplyDelete
  41. smut clyde3:52 AM

    its willingness to let people and companies fail
    The existence of Chapter 11 Bankruptcy says otherwise.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Fred Saponara4:22 AM

    Just what did they certainly before Yahoo and google? la prise de rendez vousPour above TV Guide so
    they really could take a triumphal 'gotcha! ' while liberal CBS has been showing classic American movies center d'appel tunisia ,call center maroc and la recette facile from the conservative Get More Information and a href="http://recette-de-cuisine-facile.over-blog.com">follow my blog .

    ReplyDelete
  43. redoubtagain10:34 AM

    No. That's never happened to her, so by her logic it can't happen to anyone else, anywhere.
    (signed, still paying student loans twenty-five years later)

    ReplyDelete
  44. redoubtagain10:39 AM

    Men And Elephants

    ReplyDelete
  45. redoubtagain10:41 AM

    Which reminds me:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sqY0Jb3HWA

    ReplyDelete
  46. Plantsmantx7:36 AM

    You'd be surprised at the number of black conservatives name-check Malcolm X.

    ReplyDelete