Friday, April 26, 2013

THE NEW HISTORY'S GREATEST MONSTER.

Dame Noonington's hate-on for Obama has engorged to the point where she's comparing him unfavorably to Jimmy Carter. If we invade Syria, expect Noonan to pen a column from the POV of Bashar al-Assad, who will have mellowed becomingly with age, and whose personal happiness she will posit as the real reason that emotional cripple in the White House is after him.

146 comments:

  1. Jeffrey_Kramer10:00 AM

    I'm not going to read it, but someone tell me if I'm close:


    "In times like this we need a leader; but that's exactly what Obama isn't doing. Reagan was a leader. He knew how to lead people, and he wanted to lead people. And he knew that being a leader wasn't just telling everybody what to do, it meant patient explanation and necessary compromise, and that's how we knew that God had blessed us when He put Reagan in the White House, because we knew that he would always listen, always look for opportunity to make things better. Reagan, I mean, not God. Not that god hasn't been listening, I'm not saying that. I'm saying, where is this from Obama? Where is the leadership? Where is the patience? Where is the compromise? There's just ego, and speech-making, and lecturing, while the people suffer. I've got five hundred more words to fill here, and I'm not at all sure there's enough whiskey to get me through it, but . . . ."

    ReplyDelete
  2. Halloween_Jack10:05 AM

    Well, what a surprise--a metric shitload of Nooners stating the crushingly ]obvious ("But to the point. Mr. Obama was elected because he wasn't [the guy who fucked things up. Mr. Bush is popular now because he's not the guy who gets blamed for everything]. The wheel turns, doesn't it?")*, and completely oblivious to her own bigotry:

    Back to the point. What was nice was that all of them—the Bush family, the Carters and Clintons—seemed like the old days. "The way we were." They were full of endurance, stamina, effort. Also flaws, frailty, mess. But they weren't . . . creepy.

    Creepy? Why not just say "uppity", Peg? You know you want to. C'mon. Go for it. The odds that a paper that would publish someone like James Taranto would fire you for it are slim at best.

    *And what meaning does an "approval rating" for someone who seems to have done nothing with his life post-presidency but slop some oils on a canvas with the same cheerful indifference to results as his policies even mean? (Aside from the utterly unshocking news that, subtracting the proverbial 27% crazification factor, maybe one-fifth of those polled have painfully short memories.)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jeffrey_Kramer10:11 AM

    George W. Bush was full of many things, but "endurance, stamina, effort"? Or is Noonington just being in-your-face with that, lampshading her complete unconcern with external reality?

    ReplyDelete
  4. JennOfArk10:12 AM

    Amazingly, she didn't invoke Reagan even once. Not that it made the bilge she did write any more palatable.

    ReplyDelete
  5. JennOfArk10:14 AM

    If Dickens were alive today and penning the motto for the Bush era, to be engraved over the entrance to his lieberry, it would go something like this:
    "It was the worst of times; it was the worst of times."

    ReplyDelete
  6. Jeffrey_Kramer10:25 AM

    That's really astonishing, because it suggests she recognizes how close she comes to self-parody every column, and is consciously trying to avoid it. I would not have thought her capable of that degree of self-awareness. It's like seeing Skynet attain sentience.

    ReplyDelete
  7. History's newest, greatest monster is clearly Disqus.
    ~

    ReplyDelete
  8. tigrismus10:54 AM

    W is not creepy? Tell that to Angela Merkel. Or any bald guy who ever got within arm's reach.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Dennis11:17 AM

    Identical approval ratings for Bush and Obama.

    No liberal journalist has been able to explain that phenomenon with any kind of intellectual honesty so far.

    ReplyDelete
  10. BigHank5311:26 AM

    You're talking about someone who is so utterly lacking in self-awareness she wrote about getting hot and bothered over Reagan's foot.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Here you go:


    It's because a substantial portion of our population consists of the kind of moron who would vote for G.W. Bush.
    ~

    ReplyDelete
  12. DocAmazing11:34 AM

    Dennis: Look up the word "transient".

    ReplyDelete
  13. DocAmazing11:36 AM

    The WSJ killed a lot of cats to generate that bounce.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Dennis11:38 AM

    Doc, look up intellectual honesty. Go meditate for ten minutes, then come back and pretend you aren't posting on a far-left liberal blog where you're afraid everyone will think less of you if you say something half-way reasonably fair-minded.

    ReplyDelete
  15. OhioAstro11:44 AM

    We're not laughing with you. We're laughing at you.


    Now go and complain that Colbert and Stewart are not giving unbiased news reports.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Tybalt11:56 AM

    "Barack Obama was elected president in 2008 because he was not George W. Bush."


    Little-known fact: both John McCain and Mitt Romney are actually George W. Bush. Even lesser-known fact: HILLZ IS W-BUSH TOO!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Big_Bad_Bald_Bastard11:57 AM

    If we invade Syria, expect Noonan to pen a column from the POV of Bashar al-Assad, who will have mellowed becomingly with age, and whose personal happiness she will posit as the real reason that emotional cripple in the White House is after him.

    "Murderous dictators are the real job creators!"

    Oh, crap this line could be used to defend Donald Adair as well as Bashar al-Assad.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Big_Bad_Bald_Bastard11:58 AM

    Back to the point. What was nice was that all of them—the Bush family, the Carters and Clintons—seemed like the old days. "The way we were." They were full of endurance, stamina, effort.


    And they weren't full of melanin!

    ReplyDelete
  19. Oh, she was comparing him to Carter as far back as '09:

    http://www.peggynoonan.com/article.php?article=485

    ReplyDelete
  20. Big_Bad_Bald_Bastard11:58 AM

    **SHUDDER** Did you have to bring that up?

    ReplyDelete
  21. Big_Bad_Bald_Bastard12:11 PM

    It's also due to the fact that the Bush years have been stuffed down the memory hole, while the noise machine invests much of its efforts towards demonizing President Obama. History is being rewritten as we speak.

    ReplyDelete
  22. tigrismus12:15 PM

    Oh I don't know, my approval of his not being president isn't going away anytime soon.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Big_Bad_Bald_Bastard12:15 PM

    So... George W. Bush is kinda like Spartacus?

    ReplyDelete
  24. mortimer12:42 PM

    Obama's job approval rating is now at 49-51% (depending on the poll -- this is actually a couple of points higher than George W. Bush's retrospective approval rating, i.e., not identical). He is currently in office and thus on the job. George W. Bush's on the job approval rating at the end of his second term in October of 2008 was 25%. Now that's a legitimate comparison. To compare Obama's current job approval rating to how people perceive Bush now almost five years out of office is pretty meaningless. Otherwise, Jimmy Carter's job approval out of office was at one point vastly higher than Ronald Reagan's on the job.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Dennis12:43 PM

    That's what makes the 47% approval fascinating, tigrismus. Same with the intensity numbers.

    ReplyDelete
  26. sharculese12:45 PM

    Oh look a baby has come to pout and scream. Sorry you hitched your wagon to a train of failure, shouty baby!

    ReplyDelete
  27. Uncle Kvetch12:50 PM

    Go meditate for ten minutes


    Yeah, just calm the fuck down, willya Doc? Just observe how calmly and coolly Dennis posts 250 trolling comments in this thread over the next 8 hours. You can learn a thing or two from him about keeping things in perspective.

    ReplyDelete
  28. The Dark Avenger12:55 PM

    Does the little MOTU/cubicle serf need some attention on a Friday?

    Put down the iPad and get back to work, Dwight.

    ReplyDelete
  29. BigHank531:11 PM

    Well, I'm going to go out on a limb and note that 47% is exactly the same percentage of the popular vote that Mitt Romney took home. So 47% is pretty much the percentage of people who'd rather have a Republican--any Republican, even as big an empty suit as Romney--over a Democrat. Those folks would rather have Bush back, no matter what they were saying about him in 2008.


    Honest enough for you, Dennis?

    ReplyDelete
  30. Now that you've patiently handed Dennis' ass to him on a platter - and Noonan's hers, for that matter [shudder] I'd like to offer that it just occurred to me that Peggy Noonan is a drunken Grima Wormtongue.

    As far as her role as pundit she doesn't teach us anything by extrapolating data, she doesn't have keen insights on current topics, she doesn't even have novel if disturbing contrarian arguments. Her entire schtick consists of fawning over the past with flowery language and using those reminisces to obfuscate the present. Period. End of story. And this is why Jeffrey Kramer upthread can so masterfully imitate her and predict what she's written without even having read her piece. It's always the same.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Odder1:44 PM

    During W's interminable terms, we who suffered from so-called "Bush Derangement Syndrome" were enraged about things he actually said and did.

    Now, those hounding Obama from the right are largely driven by outrages that are completely fabricated, wildly distorted, or just plain hallucinatory -- while we on the Left are enraged by things he actually says and does. *Sigh*

    ReplyDelete
  32. Yeah, notice how Libya's modern history retroactively changed once Obama moved from "coddling dictators" to "helping to overthrow one"? Now in between all the spittle-flecked shrieks of "BENGHAZI," we can pretty much infer that we could use a man like Muammar al-Gaddafi again.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Dennis3:03 PM

    Tough day hunting with the kids on Facebook today, DA? Or do you have to wait till school's out for them?

    ReplyDelete
  34. Dennis3:13 PM

    sharculese, I rarely see you step up to the plate to discuss and debate the topic and hand. You have the intelligence but the self-confidence is lacking. You're sharp with the attacks that are commonplace when a dissenting opinion arrives, but it's clear that's just a front. I honestly think you're better than that.

    ReplyDelete
  35. sharculese3:21 PM

    And I honestly think you're a dumb try-hard who should see someone about his creepy passive-aggressive streak!

    ReplyDelete
  36. The Dark Avenger3:34 PM

    His approval rating at the end of his term was 33%, not 25%

    Yes, he was dishonest by using the phrase end of his term 2008, which was in the few months at the end of Bush's term.

    Donna Brazile is a faintly liberal commentator who hasn't done anything political for years except appear on TV.

    ReplyDelete
  37. The Dark Avenger3:37 PM

    If you really think I'm a pedophile, Dennis, you should report me to the appropriate authorities. You won't because you're a cowardly sort.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Dennis3:41 PM

    Is there any chance at all you'll be saying something about the topic here, sharculese? Or should I just give up now?

    ReplyDelete
  39. sharculese3:48 PM

    should I just give up now


    As a general rule? Yeah probably. In this particular instance? Idk man, I'm not your fucking therapist.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Dennis3:54 PM

    It's not illegal to stalk kids' Facebook pages like you've admitted to doing, DA, it's just very, very weird.

    ReplyDelete
  41. XeckyGilchrist3:54 PM

    Those hounding Obama from the right are, often as not, recycling complaints liberals had about Bush.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Dennis3:59 PM

    Yes, he was dishonest by using the phrase end of his term 2008, which was in the few months at the end of Bush's term. Yeah, when the end of Bush's term was 2009 and his approval was 8 pts higher than the low point 3 months prior, it was dishonest, Stalker DA.

    ReplyDelete
  43. The Dark Avenger4:00 PM

    You're the one using the term pedophile on the Sadly, No! thread, Dennis. I'm glad to see that you can't even owe up to your own words there. It reveals just what kind of sick, twisted, vicious conservative you are. Go peddle your puke somewhere else and get off the iPad, Dwight.

    ReplyDelete
  44. The Dark Avenger4:05 PM

    He chose the low point on purpose,


    And said when it was low, and of course, anyone who didn't know that he wasn't referring to Jan 2009 was fool in to thinking that GWB had a little more than a quarter of the country behind him, when the truth was that it was a whole 1/3rd of the country. And that's not allowing for MoE, which would tell you with 2% variance, the scores could've been closer or further apart by as much as 4%.


    Look, Dennis, I know you get offended by the existence of people who wouldn't get a stiffie about GWB and RMoney, but there are more of us than folks on your side. Get used to it.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Halloween_Jack4:10 PM

    I feel you, brother. Er... metaphorically, that is.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Dennis4:23 PM

    Surely you have an opinion on the blog topic, no, sharculese? Maybe if you googled it?

    ReplyDelete
  47. Dennis4:30 PM

    You can be a pedophile and not be breaking the law. Your urges are not illegal, per se, DA, fortunately enough for you. And neither is cruising kids' FB pages that you don't know.....again, fortunately for you. It's just very, very, very creepy.

    ReplyDelete
  48. sharculese4:31 PM

    I would rather be funny than whatever the fuck it is you want me to be, and all the gross-ass snivel-goading in the world is not going to change that.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Dennis4:36 PM

    You're babbling. The economy was in free-fall from the summer through the fall of 2008, which was a major contributor to the dip in approval. mortimer was dishonest in highlighting that number when it was irrelevant to his argument, and incorrect in saying 'at the end of his term in 2008'.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Dennis4:40 PM

    I'd just like to hear your opinion on the blog topic for once. That shouldn't intimidate you. I've just never understood people who hang out on liberal blogs and comment as if the blog comments area was like a cheering section at a basketball game.

    ReplyDelete
  51. tigrismus4:45 PM

    You're stroking the screen right now, aren't you?

    ReplyDelete
  52. sharculese4:49 PM

    And I've never understood why people think this sort of passive-aggressive goading is going to produce anything other than condescending contempt.

    ReplyDelete
  53. smut clyde5:52 PM

    a far-left liberal blog


    Repeated for emphasis.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Big_Bad_Bald_Bastard5:54 PM

    Well, if you wish to buff my bald noggin with coconut oil (in a totes hetero way), I'll make an exception.

    ReplyDelete
  55. smut clyde5:59 PM

    "endurance, stamina, effort"
    What was the longest unbroken period Bush spent at the office between holidays?

    ReplyDelete
  56. Tudor Jennings6:03 PM

    Would that be the economy that was in freefall under W's watch?
    Or can you use some of those "statistical stylings" of yours to blame it on Obama?
    Oh... _do_ please try! :)

    ReplyDelete
  57. Tudor Jennings6:05 PM

    That he's a retard?

    ReplyDelete
  58. Big_Bad_Bald_Bastard6:08 PM

    Now, now, let's not denigrate the handicapped by comparing them to Dubya.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Halloween_Jack6:12 PM

    "half-way reasonably fair-minded"? Try hitting that mark yourself, sport, even once.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Halloween_Jack6:13 PM

    shhhhhhhhh

    ReplyDelete
  61. smut clyde6:21 PM

    The "creepy", I assume, is Noonan's version of a currently-popular talking point -- Obama is too professional, doesn't emote enough, makes rational decisions rather than emotional ones. In short, he has failed to be an angry black man, so they complain of the lack of overt anger.

    all of them—the Bush family, the Carters and Clintons—seemed like the old days.

    This from the author of "The Case Against Hillary Clinton"; the author of the phrase "Bill Clinton was the political version of a cow's head in formaldehyde". It is entertaining to bring up her old columns and see how much she hated Clinton as a president, but now she is in love with Clinton and she has always been in love with Clinton.

    ReplyDelete
  62. mortimer6:21 PM

    Yes, my inherent liberal dishonesty made me not only label October of 2008 "at the end of Bush's term" (as opposed to "at the beginning" or "in the middle"), but my cheap, lazy deceit made me blatantly insult astute readers such as yourself by using the phrase "in October of 2008" to deliberately throw you off. My liberal cunning also made me pick a number that was lower by a few percentage points than the exact moment Bush left office which changes everything.

    In my defense, I can only say I took my cue from the dishonest LIEberal who wrote this:
    When Bush left office, his approval rating was down in the 20s to low 30s.

    ReplyDelete
  63. smut clyde6:42 PM

    Tell it to any Clintons standing near to Bush after he's just shaken hands with a Haitian and therefore feels the need to wipe his hand.
    Or any woman in a sweater when he needs a kleenex.


    * Veiled glasses-cleaning reference.

    ReplyDelete
  64. smut clyde6:47 PM

    The past, for Noonan, is another country, so we might as well lie about it in the lead-up to invading it and stealing its oil.

    ReplyDelete
  65. It seems you haven't been reading nearly enough wingnut blogs (which means you're probably saner than me). Yes. Yes, there are angry conservatives who will tell you with a straight face that Obama is stupid, uneducated, developmentally disabled, etc. There are wingnuts who think (or say they think) he is the dumbest politician in U.S. history. I'm sure there is a wingnut blogger who insists that Obama literally can't read, and that he has someone reading his teleprompter out loud to him. Half of them say this stuff in a tone of "everyone knows this-- it's obvious, just look at the guy"; the other half sound like they know it's bullshit, but that liberals once said similar things about their guy so now it's their turn, since of course it's all just a big fucking game.

    ReplyDelete
  66. We have always been at war with the dolphins.

    ReplyDelete
  67. smut clyde7:56 PM

    But but affirmative action! Suppressed college grades! Ghostwritten books!

    ReplyDelete
  68. Dennis, why are you fondling the bodies of dead rapist pedophiles? Trying to return your foul spirit to your original body?

    ReplyDelete
  69. tigrismus8:03 PM

    "endurance, stamina, effort"


    Shorter Nooners: sploosh!

    ReplyDelete
  70. How the hell can you be both far-left AND liberal?

    ReplyDelete
  71. smut clyde8:07 PM

    If "sploosh" requires endurance, stamina and effort, then very possibly you are doin it rong.

    ReplyDelete
  72. I know, and sweet smoochies are yours.

    ReplyDelete
  73. Yes, Dennis sure won that debate. I can't believe I was so outlandish as to claim that I had seen online wingnuts trash-talking Obama in a ridiculous manner, and that I believed many of them to be insincere, when everyone knows that trash talk is often insincere and that mentioning other people's ridiculous bullshit is exactly the same as making up bullshit of your own. God, I'm so ashamed.


    I promise I'll stop feeding this troll now.

    ReplyDelete
  74. The Dark Avenger10:10 PM

    Don't have an answer to either question, Dennis?


    Why am I not surprised?

    ReplyDelete
  75. smut clyde2:19 AM

    sharculese, I rarely see you step up to the plate to discuss and debate
    the topic at hand. You have the intelligence but the self-confidence is
    lacking, so you resort to this sort of cheerleader/moderator role.



    What with the insomnia and the akvavit and the fugue states, I am sometimes somewhat weirdly behaved, but I take consolation in the knowledge that I am not maintaining little dossiers on the commenting history of other contributors to Alicublog.

    ReplyDelete
  76. Provider_UNE3:15 AM

    Sure, it's creepy, Dennis, just like you calling Dark Avenger out of the blue because you looked up his phone number on the Internet.


    No wonder Rebecca is thinking of divorcing your ass next month.

    ReplyDelete
  77. Provider_UNE3:17 AM

    You're half-way towards going postal, Dennis, we all expect some bad news from Norfork, VA involving you and a stolen firearm sometime. Please, get some help before you hurt someone.

    ReplyDelete
  78. Provider_UNE3:19 AM

    Last time I checked, October in the last 25% of the year, but thanks for demonstrating what a real moron looks like, especially one from Indiana.

    ReplyDelete
  79. Provider_UNE3:21 AM

    Thanks for demonstrating what a weaselly idiot Dennis really is.

    ReplyDelete
  80. Provider_UNE3:24 AM

    Dennis has plenty of people he watches: Actor212, JennofArk, Zython, Dark Avenger, and, of course, his next-door neighbor when she's sleeping and he watches her through her bedroom window.

    ReplyDelete
  81. smut clyde3:30 AM

    That is venturing into dossier territory right there.

    ReplyDelete
  82. Provider_UNE3:32 AM

    Yes, you should respond to Dennis like this is his blog, or something.

    ReplyDelete
  83. Provider_UNE4:52 AM

    Just telling the truth, based on Dennis's past history.


    I haven't kept track of who said what to whom, only that they have all pissed him off in the past for the crime of being a librul who talks back to him.

    ReplyDelete
  84. reallyaimai6:30 AM

    It's like seeing a hamster pass the Turing test.

    ReplyDelete
  85. Dennis7:15 AM

    Ha. Add smut clyde to the growing list of liberals who think you're a bizarre stalker freak, DA.

    ReplyDelete
  86. mortimer7:59 AM

    mortimer was dishonest in highlighting that number

    Peggy Noonan, in the very column Roy's post is about said this:
    When Bush left office, his approval rating was down in the 20s to low 30s.

    Is she being dishonest, too? Actually, it turns out I was being generous to note Mr. Bush's 25% approval rating in October of 2008, i.e., when he was on the job and not a lame duck. According to a CBS News/New York Times poll of February 11, 2009, his final approval rating was actually 22%. So, sport, I'm right, Noonan is right, and who do you want to call dishonest again?

    ReplyDelete
  87. smut clyde8:05 AM

    Add smut clyde to the growing list of liberals who think you're a bizarre stalker freak, DA.


    That is unmitigated bullshit which bears no relation to what I wrote. I think you're better than that, Dennis, WHOOPS no I don't.

    ReplyDelete
  88. Dennis8:18 AM

    smut, Yes, I notice it when people like sharculese jump in out of Lurkerland to do nothing but throw out the same trite barbs that are standard fare on blog comment sections; when after about the tenth post no attempt at arguing the blog topic is made by that person. One doesn't need to keep a dossier in those situations; their lack of confidence in addressing the blog topic and pattern of always veering toward a comfort zone of keeping to the inane barbs becomes apparent.

    ReplyDelete
  89. The Dark Avenger8:38 AM

    Yes, Dennis, whoever gains smut clyde's scorn is a loser forever.

    GAFL.

    ReplyDelete
  90. Thanks for your missives from Lurkerland, Dennis, where it seems you also reside, along with me, and where sharkulese does not, despite what you may think. As a lurker, I, unlike you, apparently, don't keep tabs on who says what so much as I like to just follow the ebb and flow of the conversation, especially when a troll shows up, which is rare, though it does, obviously, happen. But seriously, dude, if you're so interested in what Roy's pals have to say, why not just join the party and be part of the group? They're very funny. I mean, come on: "smut clyde"? Doesn't that make you just want to laugh?

    ReplyDelete
  91. smut clyde8:48 AM

    Is there any chance at all you'll be saying something about the topic here, Dennis? Or should I just give up now?

    I rarely see you step up to the plate to discuss and debate the topic at hand. You have the intelligence but the self-confidence is lacking, so you resort to this sort of cheerleader/moderator role.

    Surely you have an opinion on the blog topic, no, Dennis? Maybe if you googled it?
    I'd just like to hear your opinion on the blog topic for once. That shouldn't intimidate you.

    ReplyDelete
  92. That is quite unfair to Grima. Or do you just mean Grima in the last months in his life? Even then he was at least able to stab Saruman in the back.

    ReplyDelete
  93. tigrismus9:02 AM

    Cripes, way to let us down easy. *sniffle*

    ReplyDelete
  94. The Dark Avenger9:15 AM

    He gets a stiffie whenever he thinks of GWB and RMoney, that's the basis of his objection to those of us who don't.

    ReplyDelete
  95. XeckyGilchrist9:38 AM

    Oh, Christ! Don't do that! Ewww.


    ...coconut oil is really hard to get off a monitor.

    ReplyDelete
  96. JennOfArk9:51 AM

    Seriously. I'm surprised I didn't get "called out" on my Dickens comment.
    Shorter entire thread: Fuck off, Pennis.

    ReplyDelete
  97. Dennis9:51 AM

    smut, I never understand what it is with your hot tub group, the way you stick together on your assigned blogs, and the sense of loyalty and protection you afford one another when it comes to debating on a political blog.



    It's like stepping on a yellow-jacket. The injured bee runs away, and the hive bees swarm.



    It's slightly admirable, I guess, but it's also weird.

    ReplyDelete
  98. Haystack10:20 AM

    Average person answering pollster: Bush? He's retired, right? He can't fuck anything else up? OK, then. I approve.

    ReplyDelete
  99. Haystack10:40 AM

    Dear Troll,


    Don't confuse not responding to you as avoiding the topic at hand.


    Signed,
    The sane people on the internet.

    ReplyDelete
  100. Dennis11:12 AM

    Wasn't original. I just smh'd, Jenn. Embarrassed for you now that you're pretending you just thought of it.

    ReplyDelete
  101. "And now let's play, 'Who Wants to Be a Dick?' Dennis, are you ready? Yes, I can see you are."

    ReplyDelete
  102. reallyaimai1:44 PM

    I haven't been able to contribute to the troll punching because discus isn't working for me. A personal tragedy yesterday keeps me from enjoying the Dennis back and forth, as well. But that also have me the luxury of looking at acdennis troll episode with new eyes and new perspective. I can't link from my iPhone but, at a distance, Dennis seems more like the British guy who just got arrested for trolling the Facebook page of a young, dead, highschooler from a Podunk southern town. This asshole managed to issue the most disgusting and believable violent threats to the local school and send the entire town into lockdown. When caught and arrested the guy basically shrugged his shoulders and said he had wanted to cause the chaos, hurt, and suffering because he could. No motive but motiveless spite. Ditto Adam savader calista gigeriches furry boy toy in an elephant suit. The kid could have downloaded as much Internet poem as he could gap to but his kink was actually focused on (as he saw it) getting those co-Ed bitches to dance to his tune and pay attention to his needs. His constant refrain to his victims that they "must respond within ten minutes" really reminds me of Dennis's hall monitor shtick. He is such a pathetic outsider and self promoted me of de inside

    ReplyDelete
  103. reallyaimai1:50 PM

    Sorry. Phone acting up. "Troll provacateur" is the way that should have ended. I'm hardly the one to say this because I always feed the troll but, really, the best way to handle this guy is to not feed him the shit and negative attention he craves. He is one step--possibly right in the middle, of issuing terroristic threats just to see the effect or trying to extort attention by stealing private data. This guy Dennis is, as they used to say, sick in the head. Please steer clear of him. He seems quite disturbed.

    ReplyDelete
  104. LarryEwho1:58 PM

    Re Bush approval:



    "It's the laughter/We will remember/Whenever we remember/The way we were."


    Yes, I'm aware of the obvious joke from the word "laughter." However, I was referring to the tendency to let time give our eyeglasses a rosy tint when we look backwards. Like the other song says, "The good old days weren't always good./Tomorrow ain't as bad as it seems."

    ReplyDelete
  105. Big_Bad_Bald_Bastard3:52 PM

    Christ, what a friendless asshole:

    smut, I never understand what it is with your hot tub group, the way you stick together on your assigned blogs, and the sense of loyalty and protection you afford one another when it comes to debating on a political blog.



    He can't understand that we actually like each other. Fu-uh-uh-uh-uck... if I were such a miserable, friendless putz, I'd take a swan dive off a bridge. I imagine it's the fear of going into that dark eternal night that keeps him from offing himself.

    ReplyDelete
  106. smut clyde4:30 PM

    your hot tub group
    J'accuzi!

    ReplyDelete
  107. Dennis4:53 PM

    That's actually pretty good.

    ReplyDelete
  108. reallyaimai5:34 PM

    I'm not saying that remarks like this aren't a good thing, in and of themselves. Just that we might not want to interact with Dennis as other than a deliberate spoof troll. It feels like being an innocent unwitting member of the audience who rushes onstage when the performer pretends to have a heart attack only to find himself vomited on by an insult/gross out artist as part of the show.

    ReplyDelete
  109. Big_Bad_Bald_Bastard6:15 PM

    Have we really been at war, or have we just been working at cross porpoises?

    ReplyDelete
  110. smut clyde7:33 PM

    Transporting mynahs? Staid lions? Immortal porpoises? That never happened and anyway we should be looking forward rather than raking up the past.

    ReplyDelete
  111. Big_Bad_Bald_Bastard7:45 PM

    It's actually an expression horror. He revealed the soul-sucking void at his core. I mean, read the core of his quote with the excess verbiage excised and you get a really tragic message I never understand the way you stick together, and the sense of loyalty and protection you afford one another

    I would pity him if he weren't so hateful. I try to not to feed the troll, but I don't see him as a deliberate spoof troll (now, that would be Gary Ruppert), I see him as a genuinely disturbed individual.

    ReplyDelete
  112. smut clyde7:52 PM

    You are missing the true outrage here, viz. the confusion of different families within the Hymenoptera.
    It's like stepping on a yellow-jacket. The injured bee runs away, and the hive bees swarm..
    Wasps is not bees. I SAY GOOD-DAY.

    ReplyDelete
  113. The Dark Avenger8:07 PM

    Nobody can be as embarrassing as you, Pennis.

    ReplyDelete
  114. The Dark Avenger8:12 PM

    It would be better if you were more informed about members of the order Hymenoptera instead of confusing them like the idiot fuck you are.

    ReplyDelete
  115. JennOfArk8:31 PM

    Wasn't original.
    No shit, Sherlock. Hence the reference to Dickens.

    ReplyDelete
  116. Big_Bad_Bald_Bastard8:32 PM

    Run, run like a bee!

    ReplyDelete
  117. reallyaimai8:57 PM

    I would like to cling bitterly to all your comments, bbbb, like a Pennsylvanian to his gay guns.

    ReplyDelete
  118. Big_Bad_Bald_Bastard9:42 PM

    Be careful, they're all slathered with coconut oil, so they're slippery.

    ReplyDelete
  119. reallyaimai6:50 AM

    I need to give a shout out to this wonderful new word:snivel-goading. Not only does it sound like s.j.perlmans idea of a good name for an English village but it perfectly describes Dennis himself.

    ReplyDelete
  120. Dennis8:23 AM

    No, the play on Dickens' quote wasn't original, not even as it pertained to Bush's two terms. You were so proud of it you posted it over at Balloon Juice, too.

    And now you say "Seriously. I'm surprised I didn't get "called out" on my Dickens comment"? What's there to call out, the play on his quote has been used so many times now it's not even noteworthy. But you act like you were the original with it. That's just embarrassing...not to mention that you felt you even had to reference Dickens in the first place. Good Lord.

    ReplyDelete
  121. Dennis8:52 AM

    Interesting how many of you guys have suicidal thoughts, Bald Bastard, but I guess if nothing else, it's good to talk openly about them on a political forum. No, the friend thing is fine, what I don't get is that you all think you have to come in to aid someone you see is not doing so well in an honest political disagreement, like ' Gee, one-on-one, my friend is getting his/her rear-end kicked, but I think she just forgot to say a couple things she should have, so I'll go in to help her out so she doesn't look so bad'. And you rarely do it by offering a counter to the political debate, it's usually some pet Freudian thing you've been pondering lately that you want to get off your chest, like you and aimai just did here...."Oh God, Dennis reminds me off [insert some BS psychological theory you have about a recent event that you thought was pure evil]. If I were him, I'd consider getting help, or offing myself."


    It's lazy and it's routine. But it is standard fare as far as your group goes.

    ReplyDelete
  122. The Dark Avenger9:47 AM

    Just like it's not illegal to look up someone's number and call them up out of the blue, right, Dennis?

    ReplyDelete
  123. The Dark Avenger9:49 AM

    You're so funny, Dennis, I forgot to laugh.

    ReplyDelete
  124. The Dark Avenger9:56 AM

    And you take such delight in coming here and telling us what a group mind we have, Dennis.

    Get out of the house and enjoy life for a change, Denny, instead of being such a downer boi.

    ReplyDelete
  125. Dennis12:32 PM

    Likely you're the one up-voting yourself from the four or five Disqus log-ins you've created. You're pretty much a shunned outsider here, too.



    Liberals can defend people who stalk kids' Facebook pages, but that doesn't necessarily mean they'll invite them to their parties.

    ReplyDelete
  126. Dennis12:41 PM

    Tom Degan: The Rant "The Decade That Wasn't"

    And a special tip of the old fedora to George W. Bush. Anyone who can make me
    nostalgic for the likes of Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan has a
    certain talent, no doubt about it. His entire eight-year-reign seems
    almost surreal in hindsight. In a twisted and cynical paraphrasing of
    Charles Dickens, "It was the worst of times. It was the worst of times."

    ReplyDelete
  127. The Dark Avenger12:52 PM

    Likely you're the one up-voting yourself from the four or five Disqus
    log-ins you've created. You're pretty much a shunned outsider here,
    too.


    I see you're using the new Dennis Disqus with 21 comments, Denny. As someone said at Sadly, No!, "It's all about projection, isn't it?"




    Yes, I'm not included in the Libruls parties and not allowed in any of their Reindeer games.

    ReplyDelete
  128. The Dark Avenger12:55 PM

    Great minds think alike, Dennis, which is why nobody here ever agrees with you :-)

    ReplyDelete
  129. Dennis12:56 PM

    Feeble minds copy and paste and pretend they're they're being original, Copypasta DA.

    ReplyDelete
  130. The Dark Avenger12:58 PM

    Just like you did, Dennis?


    Good point.

    ReplyDelete
  131. Dennis1:02 PM

    I cited my source, DA the Feeble-minded Child FaceBook Stalker.

    ReplyDelete
  132. Dennis1:05 PM

    DA justifying himself: "I was only trying to do some research for my blog, Officer, honest."

    ReplyDelete
  133. The Dark Avenger1:13 PM

    You're the one who insists on interacting with someone who is feeble-minded, Dennis.

    23 comments. Yah!

    ReplyDelete
  134. The Dark Avenger1:13 PM

    24 comments. Yah!

    ReplyDelete
  135. reallyaimai4:44 PM

    It's obvious that the friend thing is not ok with Dennis. Whatever he may pretend in his comments there is a huge divide between Dennis and the regular alicublog commenters. We enjoy each others company and he does not. We laugh st each others jokes and he affects to disdain us and our humor entirely. He's like a lactose intolerant diabetic going into a premium ice cream store and having a public melt down because no special ersatz substitute ice cream is available. He could go down the street and get what he needs at a store that caters to diabetics but it seems really important to him to tantrum right here, right now. And also it seems typical of his shtick thst he pretend that his taste for fake ice cream is a high class choice rather than a base and accidental necessity. Dennis: if you have any friends and admirers they aren't here and, speaking only for myself they never will be. Your taste for pooping on the carpet and demanding applause seems somewhat... Problematic. Do you think you might be able to find dome people who like you, poop znd all, or will you continue to show up here to get the attention you crave?

    ReplyDelete
  136. Big_Bad_Bald_Bastard4:46 PM

    Never had a suicidal thought in my life, friendless Dennis. Never spent hours trolling a blog run by people I thought of as enemies either.

    Friendless Dennis has a funny ring to it, sounds like a Late 70's Stiff Records recording artist.

    ReplyDelete
  137. smut clyde5:13 PM

    Just stop it, you two. We love both of you just as much, OK?

    ReplyDelete
  138. TheSailor5:54 PM

    You mean 25% when he was in office?

    ReplyDelete
  139. reallyaimai7:57 PM

    What did I say? One step from issuing terroristic threats for shits and giggles. Should have taken my own advice. Now I'm in the same boat with every other innocent blog commenter. I've inadvertantly been drawn into Dennis's geek show. Forced to watch him bite the heads of chickens and display his genitalia to the awed crowds.

    As for my family. Please little man. My grandmother could have kicked your ass.

    ReplyDelete
  140. The Dark Avenger8:02 PM

    As well as anything else that proves they exist.

    ReplyDelete
  141. The Dark Avenger8:04 PM

    Dennis doesn't have much family to speak about, his father ended his days doing impressions of William Henry Harrison to drunken Indiana farmers and other frequenters of the vaudeville.

    ReplyDelete
  142. Dennis8:05 PM

    I wouldn't hurt a fly, and if you went back over the thread here, you'd see my responses weren't even a tenth as ornery and hateful as what's been thrown at me. And that's nice about your grandmother. The fact is, whatever it is you're trying to do, you're not good at it at all. Every liberal blog is full of people like you who like to play the Freudian psychotherapist from bits and pieces they've read on the internet, throw it out there, then don't like the responses, throw up their hands and say "I never should've bothered with you in the first place. You're probably a terrorist anyway."


    You're common, aimai.

    ReplyDelete
  143. Dennis8:14 PM

    Wow, I left here for four hours for a family activity, and then come back here to answer fan mail, and within 12 minutes of my posting you've already responded, like a little terrier puppy dog waiting for it's master, wagging its little tail and panting the whole time

    It really is a dependency thing with you, isn't it, Facebook Stalker DA?

    ReplyDelete
  144. Big_Bad_Bald_Bastard10:07 PM

    The Sagacious Antipodean observes that today is International Act Like a Jack Vance Character Day, therefore, let us cease exchanging obloquies with a pusillanimous mooncalf. Rather, let us create a nuncupatory tapestry of charm and piquancy, a scintilla of syllables to delight and amaze. Troubadour, ply your ukulele and kazoo so that we may engage in corybantic endeavors!

    ReplyDelete
  145. If she could call him a steely-eyed rocket man with a straight face, she is capable of anything.

    ReplyDelete
  146. The Dark Avenger8:44 AM

    You're the one who keeps track of Jenn of AR, Actor212, Zython and others, Dennis. You shouldn't be standing waist-high in a dung heap when you throw your shit at other people, Dennis Gene.


    55 Comments. How many identities do you need to post under, Mr Schlacter?

    ReplyDelete