Sunday, March 27, 2011

RENT SEEKING. Nicole Gelinas is still beating the drum for an end to rent stabilization in New York, but now she has a new angle -- stabilization advocates should give up because anti-stabilization has already won:
If you look at how much government-protected tenants pay, they’re not getting a break. Sixty-two percent of “rent-stabilized” households paid between $800 and $1,750 monthly in 2008. But 56.8% of vacant non-regulated apartments rented in the same range.

Man bites dog: What the pols and the market have done worked.

Former Gov. George Pataki allowed vacant apartments to escape regulation above $2,000, so between 1994 and 2009, nearly 100,000 units have become unregulated — spurring landlords to invest and compete for tenants. Government bureaucrats have been reasonable about allowing landlords to raise the rent on “stabilized” units, and landlords have maintained them better.

New York has what the pols have long said was their goal: a healthy market...

If the rules expired (with some exceptions for the elderly and poor), chances are things would remain much as they are today.
That is, the apartments still cost an arm and a leg to rent -- and you're much less likely to luck into a deal than you used to be -- but every so often your landlord might re-grout your shower tiles. Thanx, free market! You're every bit the miracle we expected.

So why is she even talking? I thought at first she just wanted to gloat at the rent-poor peons (this is a person, after all, who thinks New Yorkers don't pay enough to ride the subway). But it soon became clear she's in it for the class war:
New Yorkers have gotten tired of people who’ve gotten cheap apartments because of connections or luck...
No poll data cited, of course. This is conservative boilerplate on the order of their anti-union propaganda -- it's based the notion that, if someone else is getting a break, citizens ought to feel resentful and punitive, instead of asking why the system can't be fixed so that they could get similar breaks for themselves. Don't ask for more, in other words -- only ask that others get less.

And in case you were tempted to take her seriously:
In “mixed income” buildings, one person can pay $3,000 a month for a one-bedroom while the person down the hall pays $1,200, not because of appreciable differences in income but because of chance. If the market was allowed to do its job, that $1,200 may go up — but that $3,000 would also likely go down.
Does anyone on God's green earth believe that a landlord getting $3,000 a month in New York City is going to lower the rent, ever? Only if the city collapses -- which a few more years of this bullshit might accomplish.

11 comments:

  1. Anonymous10:20 AM

    Wonderful post but I was wondering if you could write a litte
    more on this topic? I'd be very thankful if you could elaborate a little bit further. Cheers!
    Look into my web-site http://www.daily-wet-tshirt.com/

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous7:32 PM

    Thanks for the marvelous posting! I genuinely enjoyed
    reading it, you can be a great author.I will be sure to bookmark your blog and definitely will
    come back at some point. I want to encourage that
    you continue your great posts, have a nice evening!
    Take a look at my homepage ; nude teens

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous7:16 PM

    I seldom leave remarks, but I browsed a few of the
    responses here Untitled. I do have a few questions for you if you tend
    not to mind. Could it be just me or does it appear like some of the comments appear as if they are coming from brain dead people?
    :-P And, if you are writing on other social sites, I'd like to keep up with anything fresh you have to post. Would you post a list of all of all your public sites like your Facebook page, twitter feed, or linkedin profile?
    my webpage :: ebony green porn star

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous5:54 PM

    Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point.
    You obviously know what youre talking about, why waste your
    intelligence on just posting videos to your site when you could
    be giving us something enlightening to read?
    Have a look at my web page ... porntube

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous8:21 PM

    I simply could not depart your site prior to suggesting that I extremely loved the usual info an individual supply for your visitors?
    Is going to be again steadily to investigate cross-check new posts
    My web page porn wide wife world

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous7:08 AM

    Hi! Would you mind if I share your blog with my zynga
    group? There's a lot of folks that I think would really enjoy your content. Please let me know. Cheers
    Look at my web site :: Blackberry Hijacking

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous4:06 PM

    Hey there! This post could not be written any better!

    Reading this post reminds me of my good old room mate!
    He always kept talking about this. I will
    forward this page to him. Fairly certain he will have a good read.
    Thanks for sharing!
    Feel free to visit my blog vidacup review

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous2:17 AM

    I really like what you guys tend to be up too.
    This kind of clever work and exposure! Keep up the superb works guys I've incorporated you guys to our blogroll.
    Here is my web-site Upper James Manor - Greg Iacomo

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous11:05 PM

    Hi to every one, as I am in fact keen of
    reading this weblog's post to be updated regularly. It contains fastidious information.

    Have a look at my weblog; Free p movie Downloads

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous11:05 PM

    What's up, this weekend is nice in favor of me, for the reason that this occasion i am reading this great educational article here at my home.

    my webpage: http://www.voyeursexpages.org/

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous5:27 AM

    Pretty! This was a really wonderful post. Thanks for providing
    this information.

    Review my web-site :: free adult websites

    ReplyDelete