Well, we do live in an age of saturation coverage. Still I was reminded of this:
[CNN's ART] HARRIS: What is the tone of Monica Lewinsky?Conservatives have been aching for a Clinton blowjob do-over ever since, but only such smaller game as Spitzer has been available. So they reflexively recreate the tropes of yesteryear in the rotisserie league. Maybe if the women attached to those powerful Democratic men could be turned, this time, something like a retroactive victory may be achieved. Maybe American women in general will at last see who their real friends are...
[LUCIANNE] GOLDBERG: Sort of semi-hysterical when she's talking about him. You know, girl in distress.
HARRIS: Girl in love?
GOLDBERG: Yeah, I suppose. Yeah. Oh, yeah, she's in love, yeah.
HARRIS: Could it have been a fantasy?
GOLDBERG: No, absolutely not.
HARRIS (voice-over): Monica Lewinsky crying on the shoulder of Linda Tripp, who saw herself as a big sister.
GOLDBERG: The thing that Monica was going through with the president not seeing her and not taking her calls, and she just said to me, that poor girl, that poor girl, because this kid's heart was breaking. She was in love with a married man and talking to her girlfriend about how painful it was.
HARRIS (on camera): To be the other woman?
GOLDBERG: To be the other woman. And Linda felt very sorry for her.
Alas, it doesn't work out. The cheater's spouse is chucked in with him on the pyre, and the ashes are bitterly stirred.
Meanwhile back in Washington, the more customary, less sexy malfeasance continues. Somehow I don't think we'll being seeing any deep-think pieces on the state of mind of Mrs. Christopher J. Ward.
No comments:
Post a Comment