UPDATE: Sullivan responds to this post without linking to it. Great. I guess you want to make it hard for your readers to see what I actually said. He prefers to link to the Instapundit post that links to this. What's that all about? How many times is he going to print my name over there and talk about me without linking to me? It's really unfair! It flaunts unfairness!...and
And you, Andrew Sullivan, refuse to engage with the serious argument I am making here. If you linked to the posts you talk about and cut way down, your readers would have a fair chance to see what I am saying. I have obviously agreed with your basic definition but called you on your overuse of it and the air of hostility toward religious people you're giving off. Why don't you deal with my argument fairly, including links to me, and why don't you treat me as an individual instead of lamely and inaccurately merging me with Glenn Reynolds? Glenn and I have taken different positions on this, and I'm the main blogger writing about the subject, so why are you linking to him linking to me?
Why does Andrew Sullivan keep talking about me without linking to me?Emphasis added 'cause I think it's funny.
See the update on this post. It's getting ridiculous. I consider it a gross breach of blogging ethics.
Maybe I'm misreading this. Maybe it's all actually some sort of elaborate joke. Her whole blog, I mean.
UPDATE. Why did I bother? A commenter mentions that Altmouse is back! What a hoot!
No comments:
Post a Comment