Thursday, July 18, 2013

¡AYYY, NO ES BUENO!

At National Review, Rachel Campos-Duffy is blowing the lid off... Eva Longoria, producer of Devious Maids, which sounds like typically prime-time crap to us, but to Campos-Duffy it's racist. Well, not racist exactly, just hypocritical-liberal-racist because Longoria's tight with those radical Latino groups and shouldn't be getting away with such stuff.
Much has been said about the controversy swirling around Eva Longoria’s decision to be the executive producer of Lifetime Television’s Devious Maids, a prime-time soap about sexy Latina domestic workers who occasionally sleep with their bosses. Less has been reported about Ms. Longoria’s key relationships with her biggest defenders and America’s most powerful Hispanic NGOs, as well as her relationship with the finance chair of the Democratic National Committee, Henry Muñoz. 
The hypocrisy is difficult to swallow. After all, these are the same organizations that battled with Disney over an animated princess’s being insufficiently “Latina” (read, too white) and found sexism and gender insensitivity in their political opponents at every turn, accusing them of launching an all-out “war on women.” Does anyone doubt that the National Council of La Raza and the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) would have crucified Devious Maids creator Marc Cherry if a powerful Democratic Latina donor had not been attached to the project?
Shit, I don't know. But tell me this: Have those sinister Latino groups come out against Iris Chacón for racial recidivism? Because when you're runnin' down La Bomba, hombre, you'll walkin' on the fighting side of me.


Also, has La Raza tried to shut down Telemundo comedy sketches for their undignified portrayals of the gente? I'm guessing not. And The Simpsons' Bumblebee Man is still on TV. Maybe they're all pals of Longoria and the Democrats, and equally in on the hypocri-conspiracy!

Still, Campos-Duffy thinks her idea of what Latino groups might have done is a bombshell, because this non-event is obviously tied to Longoria's activities with Democratic groups -- "the support she is receiving amid this controversy from the DNC and Hispanic NGOs recalls the kind of cronyism, amiguismo, and back scratching of the countries so many Latinos left behind." I understand Ricky Ricardo pulled the same shit, forgetting his roots to hang out with Fred and Ethel Mertz.

Portraying this absence of action as "the campaign to save Eva," Campos-Duffy claims it's "having some unintended consequences. It’s pulling back the curtain and exposing the nexus between money and Democratic politics. Powerful Hispanic community organizations are putting one Latina over the best interests, empowerment, and advancement of all Latinos."

I guess I have to be the one to tell them: Conservatives are so freaking bad at ethnic pandering, they ought to break down and take lessons. They're always screaming about race hustlers and race pimps -- couldn't they just sidle up to one sometime and offer him a wad of cash to teach them how to do it?

68 comments:

  1. BigHank5310:32 AM

    Shorter Campos-Duffy:somebody stands to make a profit from an exploitative TV show--and they're not white!

    ReplyDelete
  2. LookWhosInTheFreezer10:50 AM

    I sort of wish Longoria was still with Tony Parker just so we could see what this story would look like once conservatives auto-replaced their fears of the Macarena becoming the new National Anthem, and schools forcing mole sauce down the throats of our children with some good old fashioned Francophobia.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well, wait... the only hyprocisy here would maybe have to do with feminism, not race. (Not that those two can't be intertwined). But since when have National Refuse cared about either, except to hate and decry?

    ReplyDelete
  4. fraser10:52 AM

    Yes, Longoria's clear commitment to playing a PC role model character on Desperate Housewives clearly shows what Latinos really want to see on TV. so only corruption and hypocrisy can explain their silence now.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Jay B.10:52 AM

    Having successfully driven the black menace from their ranks, I see that the conservative outreach apparatus are now firmly fixed on driving down that 30% Latino number. Even if she had a point (which I doubt, but can't be arsed to give a fuck about enough to investigate), the fixation on the trivial (a whole show about SLUTTY HOT LATINAS?!?) overlooks the long and loud shouting about "illegals" and RINOs soft on "amnesty" and "stop and ask for their papers" laws which are rather more direct and impactful in their approach to the Latino-American experience. It's like complaining about the fact that white people say "cracker" at an anti-Klan rally.

    And not for nothing, but I wonder if Campos-Duffy can figure out the connection between Devious Maids and the fact that it's brought to you by one of the leads from Desperate Housewives. That or maybe she dreams of her pitch to network execs; Compromised Ethnics.

    ReplyDelete
  6. tigrismus11:12 AM

    Does anyone doubt that the National Council of La Raza and the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) would have crucified Devious Maids creator Marc Cherry if a powerful Democratic Latina donor had not been attached to the project?

    I don't watch TV, but every radio program I've heard discuss it has used the word "stereotype" pretty freely in their none-too-complimentary discussions. If the exact same response were given to a Christian show I bet they'd call it a crucifixion.

    ReplyDelete
  7. XeckyGilchrist11:16 AM

    found sexism and gender insensitivity in their political opponents at every turn, accusing them of launching an all-out “war on women.”


    Softcore is exactly the same as slashing women's health funding and food aid to poor children.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yep. HPV? Right to abortion? Trivial.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hmm, perhaps someone's realized that a show about the antics of hot Latina domestic servants could further undercut resistance to immigration reform.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Big_Bad_Bald_Bastard12:12 PM

    A sexy show on the television? I'm scandalized.


    Nice, the ad on the side is for Dominican Cupid dot com. Chul' y linda, ande conmigo. Te quieres, mi alma.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Oh, you ARE the scandal, big boy.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Big_Bad_Bald_Bastard12:14 PM

    "Heads I win, tails you lose!" is a common game among the righties.

    ReplyDelete
  13. XeckyGilchrist12:18 PM

    My Spanish is rusty and maybe the dialect differs from what I learned, but doesn't "te quieres" mean "you want/love yourself?"


    ...works, I guess.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Yeah, I'm more partial to "If it's heads I'll go to Tennessee, tails I'll buy a drink... if it lands on the edge I'll keep talking to you". But since the edge you always keep me on is a good one, the coins command me to speak.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Halloween_Jack12:34 PM

    somebody stands to make a profit from an exploitative TV show--and they're not white! Campos-Duffy, who tried out for the conservative slot on The View twice, and failed.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Is this true or just a joke? Because as a joke it's pretty good, but if it's true I may die laughing.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Seriously, is National Review even pretending not to be racist anymore?

    ReplyDelete
  18. As usual, the damn liberals are shoving things down our throats.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Well, they've always been bad at it. Not the being racist part, at that they excell, but the pretending part. so if they'd just drop it, that would be refreshing.

    ReplyDelete
  20. JennOfArk12:57 PM

    Well, yeah. Because those are the only odds that will truly compensate them for the inconvenience of having to acknowledge that those people even exist. "Why do you vex us so with your presence and insistence that you're human beings and should be treated as such?" Surely such annoying people must be guilty of something.

    ReplyDelete
  21. And if they ain't, we can surely make up some shit to accuse them of.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Gromet1:11 PM

    Am I the only one who remembers watching Rachel Campos as a twentysomething on MTV's The Real World? As I recall she was painfully, pathetically naive in a way that caused her to say and do things that personally offended castmembers from less sheltered backgrounds (e.g., all other backgrounds) -- oh and also that she considered herself intelligent and a rebel, while every episode showed her as moping, stupidly, about something easy for everyone else to shrug off. OH AND also that she often cited her Catholicism when she wanted to stand on principle and disregarded its principles when they were inconvenient -- if I recall correctly across the vast sea since 1995 or whenever. I mean, we've all grown a lot since then, so I'm sure she's a different person now -- yeah, forget I mentioned it.

    ReplyDelete
  23. That's her??? AHHHHAHHAAA!!!! Yes, a quick searh confirmed it... holy, moly. An utter shithead then, even worse now. Pedro, R.I.P., you did more than good.

    ReplyDelete
  24. whetstone1:24 PM

    The way you describe her, it almost sounds like a National Review casting call.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Gromet1:49 PM

    the kind of cronyism, amiguismo, and back scratching of the countries so many Latinos left behind

    I am really enjoying how Campos-Duffy sees "back scratching" at a cable TV network as the USA's descent into a 1980s-Bogotá state of affairs. Pretty soon the NBC Cartel will be severing the heads of FBI agents and Obama will be selling Netflix passwords right out of the White House.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Big_Bad_Bald_Bastard1:51 PM

    Whoa, somebody at National Review is decrying cronyism? Lucianne weeps!

    ReplyDelete
  27. Big_Bad_Bald_Bastard1:55 PM

    Thanks for proofreading... I fixed it for great justice.


    I blame the heat for my conjugation lapse.

    ReplyDelete
  28. XeckyGilchrist3:12 PM

    Oh, I thought it was in the original ad, which would have been priceless.

    ReplyDelete
  29. And Sabado Gigante is the Liberal Fascism of the Mexican people.

    ReplyDelete
  30. 1/2 of a joke, she was a recurring guest host on The View, but I guess she made Elizabeth whats-her-name look like Madame Curie compare to her.

    ReplyDelete
  31. I'm unsure if that's an easy bar to jump or a hard one to limbo under.

    ReplyDelete
  32. foofoo4:43 PM

    Unless Longoria kills someone, she'll never do anything as horrible as dating Puck.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Talking about low you can go...

    ReplyDelete
  34. TGuerrant6:45 PM

    I suspect you're trying to work the discussion around to that self-licking ice cream cone again.

    ReplyDelete
  35. I... Uhh... isn't that a redundancy?

    ReplyDelete
  36. ADHDJ7:15 PM

    Not just any sexy show, my man: a sexy soap opera. On Lifetime.

    Have they no scruples, sullying an art form and a TV network both long known for promoting chastity and family values?


    Call me old fashioned, but soap operas are supposed to hold a brutal, unsentimental mirror up to society. If you want a lurid fantasy that constantly bounces from one sensationalistic artificial crisis to the next, presented by promiscuous one dimensional cardboard cutouts, we already have this thing called "the news."

    ReplyDelete
  37. lean body maximizer8:21 PM

    ow low you can go... but are we then talking about Puck or Rachel? And who went lower and on whom. www.bodymaximizer.com

    ReplyDelete
  38. LookWhosInTheFreezer8:23 PM

    I never really thought about it much but Puck was sort of the edgy version of quintessential Libertarian. Self-centered, loud-mouthed, not real bright, and totally convinced that he's not racist/homophobic etc., just one of those brave individuals who is willing to "have a conversation" that we're all scared of.

    ReplyDelete
  39. I think you mean the quintessarial paraclytic whatevers. At most. I don't actually remember much about the show, except the people. Pedro, some guy in a cowboy hat, Puck and Rachel. And a black girl who had the best, what do they call them now, "confessionals", where she basically explained that Rachel didn't make any sense. Not in what she was saying, but in what she was trying to be. And, oh fuck, I've just written a fucking paragraph about a glorified soap, haven't I? In my defence, it's the only thing of the kind i ever watched. And let this be a warning, kids: Don't ever do it. Do drugs. Do all the drugs. But don't ever watch "reality" tv. This is what one show did to me.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Bethany Spencer9:31 PM

    I'm sorry, where does the hypocrisy come in? I'm genuinely confused.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Derelict9:33 PM

    I want to take this comment to dinner, then bring it home and tear its clothes off so I can fold them neatly.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Well, you see, if organized hispanic and democratic groups don't denounce this show, then they may, uhhh.. concentrate on even more neferious things.... I guess. Seriously, it's like reading tea-leaves.

    ReplyDelete
  43. montag210:46 PM

    I think, somewhere along the transition to web media, they misplaced Buckley's thesaurus.

    ReplyDelete
  44. LookWhosInTheFreezer10:49 PM

    Damn, i did drugs AND watched the Real World! I remember there was a guy named Mohamed (only reason I remember is because the gang went to Mo's show but skipped Puck's soap-box derby, which caused the rift between Puck and everyone else.) I also remember Judd the cartoonist and the Asian med student, though I probably remember them more from the reunion show where he yelled at Puck re: Pedro, and the fact that they had started dating, which was good considering they were two of the more well-adjusted people on the show.) But that was actually the LAST reality show I watched (I swear) until recently watching old Project Runways with my wife.

    ReplyDelete
  45. montag211:03 PM

    "Much has been said" about a fucking Lifetime show?

    Maybe by the NRO nosepickers. They would watch the Brisket Palin Network, in between high-fiving each other over every stupid joke Steve Douchy makes about liberals.


    Ah, but this is not about hypocrisy. It's more culture-war schlock. "Oh, noes... the libruls control television! We're never going to win! We're never going to have the pure feudal plutocracy that natural law and Andrew McCarthy and von Mises have ordained!"


    "WE BE FUCKED AGAIN `N WE BE PISSY ABOUT IT!!!11!"

    ReplyDelete
  46. redoubt11:39 PM

    Her Compromised Ethnics pitch failed because it sounded too much like "Compromised Ethics", i.e., everydamnthingelse that passes for "news" on television.

    ReplyDelete
  47. redoubt12:01 AM

    Conservatives are so freaking bad at ethnic pandering


    But so, so good at ethnic profiling.


    Their "perfect Hispanic" is George Zimmerman.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Derelict7:27 AM

    the libruls control television!

    From the available evidence, it seems that every TV show, movies, radio program, newspaper, magazine, and blog site that is not devoted exclusively to giving conservatives continual tongue baths is yet one more example of the extreme left controlling everything.
    I've said it before: What a sad and pinched existence it is to view the entire world through political lenses.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Feigned innocence will get you no where.

    NRO sees all!
    ~

    ReplyDelete
  50. Dr. Hunky Jimpjorps8:57 AM

    Wow, cronyism and amiguismo! How tragic and trágico!

    ReplyDelete
  51. Halloween_Jack9:38 AM

    That is the only thing that Campos is known for, aside from having married another Real World cast member (now-congressman Sean Duffy) and being the spokeswoman for something called "LIBRE International", aka the Conservatives for Hispanics Voting For Us.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Halloween_Jack9:39 AM

    Puck was basically the ur-bro.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Halloween_Jack9:42 AM

    Judd Winick turned out to be a pretty good cartoonist; his account of his friendship with Zamora, Pedro and Me, is very good, as is his Barry Ween, Boy Genius series, which shows what being a child super-scientist would actually be like (a living hell, mostly). He's also done some writing for DC Comics which has ranged from good to meh.

    ReplyDelete
  54. TribalistMeathead9:43 AM

    It doesn't look like "typical prime-time crap" to me so much as "the type of soft-soft core they used to show on television back before the Internet, when you had to pay for porn."

    ReplyDelete
  55. Mr. Wonderful10:23 AM

    Dios mio, it's a telenovela. Can't this bint read Aunt Julia and the Scriptwriter and get a cl--what? Oh, right. It's National Review. Sorry, I though it was a real magazine, and not the Playbill of the long-running Broadway hit "Conservatives!"

    WHO'S WHO IN THE CAST

    RACHEL CAMPOS-DUFFY is thrilled to be on Broadway (and making her Equity minimum for health care coverage!). Previous roles include Indignant Moralizer in "That's Indignation!," Latina With Standards in "Avenue K," and Concerned American #2 in "Less Miserable." Rachel would like to thank the Founding Fathers, the Father, the Son, the Holy Ghost, and Rich Lowry.

    ReplyDelete
  56. hominhtrang10:59 AM

    I think, today's racial discrimination is still a hot issue, people should dismiss such thoughts away.

    kiem tien online

    ReplyDelete
  57. Fearguth11:34 AM

    Lest we forget, Sean Duffy, Rachel's husband, was complaining in 2011 about how tough it was to get by on his congressional salary of $174,000 a year. My response back then was:

    "Sean Duffy (R-WI) only makes $174,000 a year and is struggling to make ends meet. Would someone please volunteer to hold a bake sale to help this former reality TV star, district attorney, and father of six get over this rough spot in the road?"

    ReplyDelete
  58. That is the only thing that Campos is known for, aside from having married another Real World cast member (now-congressman Sean Duffy)

    Oh, sweet Ayn Rand's Jesus, that's right. She's married to that spoiled dumbfuck asswipe who joins Ron Johnson in the "How far Wisconsin has fallen into the pigshit" illustrated guide. A man who whines to his constituents how hard it is to make ends meet on $174,000 a year, and subsequently wins in 2012 by a larger margin than in 2010 (admittedly with lots of help from redistricting) is pretty much the poster asshole for what ails our political institutions.

    ReplyDelete
  59. LittlePig1:54 PM

    Aw, damn, *that* guy?



    Those two deserve each other.

    ReplyDelete
  60. LittlePig1:55 PM

    Saving Eva Longoria is going to be box-office boffo, baby.

    ReplyDelete
  61. LittlePig1:57 PM

    Well, in their defense, think about how big a house it takes to hold both their egos...

    ReplyDelete
  62. As Dios the God is my witness, you speak the true verdad, Jimpjorps.

    ReplyDelete
  63. Latina With Standards in "Avenue K,"


    At least until she broke character by marrying Sean Duffy.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Um, I could admit I neglected to scroll down before posting about this incident above, but why don't we just agree to call my comment an homage instead?

    ReplyDelete
  65. AGoodQuestion1:29 AM

    That's,,, Words fail.

    ReplyDelete
  66. cleter11:51 AM

    Whatever happened to Puck? Is he a congressman from Oklahoma now, or a Rand Paul media consultant, or something?

    ReplyDelete
  67. Máy ảnh Canon. Portraying this absence of action as "the campaign to save Eva," Campos-Duffy claims it's "having some unintended consequences. It’s pulling back the curtain and exposing the nexus between money and Democratic politics.

    ReplyDelete
  68. Huynhkimnga4:43 AM

    Portraying this absence of action as "the campaign to save Eva," Campos-Duffy claims it's "having some unintended consequences. It’s pulling back the curtain and exposing the nexus between money and Democratic politics

    text link
    textlink

    ReplyDelete