Sunday, January 13, 2013

NEW VOICE COLUMN UP

about Chuck Hagel's nomination and his investigation by citizen journalists. A hilarious amount of it seems to be about mischievously making points by which no normal person would be swayed -- cf. Robert Stacy McCain: "Hagel nomination and Left's dilemma: Do they hate Israel more than they love gays?" har har, as well as "By Any Means Necessary," "they bring a knife, you bring a gun," "The Chicago Way," "If that vicious bastard Andrew Sullivan supports Hagel, this is reason enough for any patriotic American to oppose the Hagel nomination," and -- here's real berserker logic for you -- "the conservative strategy must be aimed at making that 'win' as damaging as possible to the reputation of the Democratic Party," etc. I'm beginning to think McCain's a mole. But who would pay him?

102 comments:

  1. Derelict10:09 PM

    I'm hoping that the average citizen listening to the Republicans screeching about Hagel realize that the actual problem Republicans have with Hagel is that Obama nominated him.


    And who knows? Maybe, just maybe, this country can have some sort of conversation about Israel's role in determining not just U.S. Middle East policy, but it's role in deciding who our president gets to nominate to his cabinet.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Spaghetti Lee10:15 PM

    I am (seriously) not trying to start one of Those Fights, but look: Hagel's a two-term Republican senator who voted for the Iraq War, the Patriot Act, etc. He is not suddenly the Hippie King just because Obama nominated him. Who the fuck are these two-bit warmongering ogres hoping for? Jack D. Ripper?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well, the point about Andrew Sullivan isn't entirely off the mark ...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Who they're hoping for is a Republican president, duh. Notice, however, that it isn't just the GOP freaks who are critical of Hagel: it's mainstream corporate media outlets like The New York Times.
    http://www.fair.org/blog/2013/01/09/a-cabinet-of-peaceniks/

    ReplyDelete
  5. M. Krebs10:35 PM

    "Who better to preside over the gutting of American defenses than a Republican war hero?"



    Indeed.

    ReplyDelete
  6. So the game is to try and make it look as if Hagel likes to spend long weekends playing concentration camp in his swastika-lined den, and thus embarrass his nominator.

    this is truly a journey via an infinite improbability drive of suck.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Deggjr10:37 PM

    Who would pay him? The same person that paid Clint Eastwood.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Another Kiwi10:46 PM

    I'm not sure what Bibi can do about this. He's already gone full Wile E Coyote with the bomb.

    ReplyDelete
  9. parsec10:49 PM

    The Al-Jazeera English that I watch on Dish looks more like CBS News of thirty years ago. That is, they take "the news" more seriously than as just entertainment. But blowhards gotta blow hard.

    ReplyDelete
  10. BigHank5311:01 PM

    As long as it gets done...

    ReplyDelete
  11. BigHank5311:08 PM

    Israel forever; nuke Iran; the useless F35; more guns; a real War on Islam; more ships; more planes; more bombs; more money, more dead brown people; more wars; war now; war forever!


    Also, locking up all those traitors that point out that very few of the above advance either America's or civilization's interests in the slightest.


    That's what your warmongering ogres want.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Big_Bad_Bald_Bastard11:28 PM

    They don't even want Israel, they want Likud.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Big_Bad_Bald_Bastard11:29 PM

    Somebody set us up the Bibi!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Big_Bad_Bald_Bastard11:30 PM

    Hopefully, this Hagel hate will further fragment the GOP. I don't mind seeing an ill-advised Republican nominee being the sacrificial lamb for once.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I still don't know what a Weasel Zipper is, but I now know it can thunder. Thanks, Roy!

    ReplyDelete
  16. hells littlest angel12:08 AM

    What, no Jennifer Rubin? She's been quite the yappy little thing, accusing Hagel of "dabbl[ing] in anti-Semitic lingo," whatever in fuck's name that means.

    ReplyDelete
  17. hells littlest angel12:09 AM

    Perhaps he once said, "Jew eat yet?

    ReplyDelete
  18. montag212:18 AM

    Maybe this is the leading edge of a draft-Bolton-for-Defense campaign. Or something equally crackpot. It's pretty clear that even a nominal hawk such as Hagel isn't, in their view, up to the level of rapine and conquest necessary for a Secretary of Defense, if only because it was Obama nominating him.


    The real question is what nomination from Obama would satisfy them? Going by what they say, even Bibi Netanyahoo might have to break a sweat to get through confirmation.


    John Hagee, maybe?

    ReplyDelete
  19. montag212:20 AM

    Pretty much the same thing, these days....

    ReplyDelete
  20. Formerly_Nom_De_Plume12:46 AM

    Hagel once spat out Israel's dick long enough to ask them if they wanted him to swallow. Unacceptable. The fellatio must never cease.

    ReplyDelete
  21. AGoodQuestion12:51 AM

    If Danielle Pletka's AEI column isn't a prolonged "I got bupkes", I don't know what is.

    ReplyDelete
  22. montag21:10 AM

    One can't help but see all this nutblogger whinging over Hagel as kabuki. I can't, anyway. It's not as if one person can any longer singlehandedly change the defense culture (Rummy's "snowflakes," anyone?). It's been evolving for too long, the mode of operation too entrenched, insular and incestuous for any human being to alter in only a few years. It gives them a chance to scream about hurting Israel's feefees, sure, but even there, I'm doubtful that they much care except that the only people questioning Israel's behavior aren't conservatives, by and large.

    All of this relates to the age-old--and decidedly cynical and manipulative--cri de coeur that Democrats are "soft on defense." They know that Obama's choices have been made to deflect that charge and in that they sense weakness and capitulation, which further encourages them to attack. Lord knows there were better managers available than the execrable professional toady and sycophant and bungling spook, Robert Gates.

    What makes this all the more inane is that, overall, Hagel is remarkably pedestrian. Even his hawkish tendencies are unremarkable. He's not going to be a change agent. He's an expression of Obama's desire to regain and maintain a pre-crash status quo with which conservatives are otherwise quite comfortable.


    They've always had the instincts of a schoolyard bully, and they're on display in this little passion play.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Spaghetti Lee1:35 AM

    "The Thundering Weasel Zipper" is actually one of Lewis Carroll's less-remembered poems.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Tehanu1:46 AM

    I believe that's _General_ Jack D. Ripper, to you.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Spaghetti Lee2:30 AM

    "the conservative strategy must be aimed at making that 'win' as damaging as possible to the reputation of the Democratic Party,"



    Oh darn. They've been so cheerful and agreeable up to now.

    ReplyDelete
  26. smut clyde2:41 AM

    My bad. I was sure it was a Motorhead song.

    ReplyDelete
  27. smut clyde2:48 AM

    "Hagel nomination and Left's dilemma: Do they hate Israel more than they love gays?"


    McCain sounds quite rapt with his vision of left-wing debate, in which two strawmen enter the Thunderdome of his imagination. It would be churlish to inform him otherwise

    ReplyDelete
  28. smut clyde3:01 AM

    In my naivete I had imagined that the responsibility of the Secretary of Defense was over the security of the US from potential external military threats. I would have thought that the relationship between the US and a Middle East ally was the purview of the Secretary of State, and the treatment of gays was an internal affair, and if conflict arose within the Cabinet then there was a guy in charge to sort it out. So what the feck do Hegel's views on these issues have to do with anything?

    ReplyDelete
  29. Geo X3:49 AM

    You mean a Mötörhëad söng?

    ReplyDelete
  30. Haystack4:27 AM

    (he was on our side)



    Perfect, Roy.

    ReplyDelete
  31. ChrisVosburg4:55 AM

    Excuse me Duncan, you just cited the NYT, but linked elsewhere.


    Why?


    Right, why'd I ask.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Pope Zebbidie XIII6:32 AM

    I am amazed the Bush administration never thought of it.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Pope Zebbidie XIII6:36 AM

    Given how much puffery and saccharine hero-worship the US defense forces get from the press and the general public, I think it is a tribute to the level-headedness of the generals that they haven't come to believe their own publicity and tried a coup.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Pope Zebbidie XIII6:37 AM

    It's the political version of the falling cat with hot, buttered toast strapped to its back.

    ReplyDelete
  35. satch7:33 AM

    Well, military spending IS the only "jobs program" the Pugs have ever advocated spending money on.

    ReplyDelete
  36. satch7:36 AM

    It used to be enough for the William Kristols and and John Podhoretzs of the world to make Israel the 51st state, but now they won't be satisfied until the U.S. becomes the 7th Administrative District of Israel.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Doghouse Riley7:40 AM

    Perhaps sensing that she is losing the crowd, Pletka moves on to more , serious charges, e.g., "Hagel's conviction that were it not for 'the Jews,' US relations with the Middle East would be copacetic." This is not a Hagel quote, and Pletka does not supply a citation, for reasons you can guess.

    Because, clearly, anyone who sass-mouths Likud (by failing to acknowledge that there's only one side to this particular argument) is hoping to return to that Era of Good Feeling known as the British Mandate.

    This is what happens when you write about politics the way Hitchcock filmed Lifeboat.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Halloween_Jack7:53 AM

    What is it with these guys and their fascination with The Untouchables? Do they not realize that it's a highly fictionalized version of events in which most of the characters didn't exist in real life, and those that did weren't portrayed with any real accuracy? Just because it's set in and mentions Chicago? It's as if they kept talking about Obama carrying a wallet with Bad-Ass Motherfucker on it, Biden reminiscing about a Royale with Cheese, and Rahm Emanuel telling them to pretty please, with sugar on top, clean the fuckin' car.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Derelict8:34 AM

    Remember, too, that the Xtian evangelist movement in the U.S. needs Israel to exist so that the Jews can rebuild the Temple and usher in the End Times.


    This is why Israel gets a pass on anything it does (and an instant "YES!!!" to anything it asks of America).

    ReplyDelete
  40. As it turns out, you're both right.

    ReplyDelete
  41. edroso8:52 AM

    I should have done, but the fact is I'm sick to fucking death of Jennifer Rubin.

    ReplyDelete
  42. "Then she taps the side of her knows [sic] and does the Monty Python bit where Eric Idle wants to know if Terry Jones' wife is a goer."

    The side of her knows? Oh, Mr. Edroso. Please refund my subscription immediately.

    ReplyDelete
  43. BigHank538:56 AM

    If John Petraeus had been clever enough to choose a mistress who could keep her yap closed...

    ReplyDelete
  44. satch9:57 AM

    Oh, I'm sure that more than a few generals have read Seven Days In May with a wistful gleam in their eyes...

    ReplyDelete
  45. here you go...

    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/09/us/politics/for-kerry-and-hagel-doubts-about-war-born-in-vietnam.html?ref=todayspaper&_r=0

    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/09/us/politics/obama-nominees-in-step-on-light-footprint.html?ref=todayspaper&pagewanted=print

    ReplyDelete
  46. Zencomix10:18 AM

    Talking to that chair was pro bono work.

    ReplyDelete
  47. D. Sidhe10:22 AM

    For the record, FAIR is good people. Well, this FAIR. There's at least one group of jackasses out there using the name.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Join the line... it's stretches 'round the world.

    ReplyDelete
  49. I hope they let him keep the chair at least.

    ReplyDelete
  50. "Maybe things will be better... in Chicago"

    ReplyDelete
  51. D. Sidhe10:37 AM

    Noblesse oblige.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Because the FAIR article discusses, and I believe links to, more than Times article, so it's simpler to refer to it.

    ReplyDelete
  53. ChrisVosburg10:55 AM

    Thanks D, and that's kind of my point. Despite whatever good intentions, the FAIR article-- an editorial actually-- sets up both Kerry and Hagel to be warmongers, by cherrypicking their past statements, while the NYT article does not, instead choosing to review what they have said in context.

    It's dishonest on FAIR's part, and I don't think it accurately portrays either of them.

    Don't get me wrong: I greatly admire FAIR and have done for several years, I just think they got this one wrong.

    I further think that the author of the article, Peter Hart, is misplaced. His style is not the dispassionate truth-telling and fact-finding of this branch of journalism, and perhaps he'll find his place at, say, Fox News.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Better than dabbling in anti semitic esperanto.

    ReplyDelete
  55. ChrisVosburg11:12 AM

    uh, yeah...
    It's reminiscent of a well traveled road we use here in Hollywood: find a single word in a disparaging review of a bad movie and cite it in the trailer.
    For example, imagine that Roger Ebert writes: The most appallingly bad film i've ever seen, despite fabulous sets"
    In the trailer:
    Fabulous!
    -- Roger Ebert
    In other words, gimme a break, Duncan.

    ReplyDelete
  56. Mr. Wonderful11:24 AM

    One of these days the concern trolls of the right are going to encounter the projection leaders of the right at a conference or an NR cruise, and the result will be the annihilation of both in a burst of pure bullshit. I just hope there's video.

    ReplyDelete
  57. montag211:54 AM

    Not to mention the fallout on his brother, David.

    ReplyDelete
  58. I think you mean anti-semiotic.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Why? Bullshit meets bullshit and a cannibalistic coprophagous lunch is self-catered.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Uncle Kvetch12:11 PM

    Hopefully, this Hagel hate will further fragment the GOP.

    Nope. Hagel ceased to be a Republican the day he accepted Obama's offer, instead of telling the Usurper to go fuck himself. He's as much a Republican as GWB, which is to say not at all.

    ReplyDelete
  61. BigHank5312:20 PM

    Reminder to self: never post before caffeine.

    ReplyDelete
  62. edroso12:24 PM

    Just for that, you can't go on the cruise.

    ReplyDelete
  63. I'd like to see him nominate Rumsfeld*...just to see what they'd do.




    *Not really.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Aw, fuck it... since the wingy fringe won't approve anyone anyway, Obama ought to go all out and nominate Ward Churchill.

    ReplyDelete
  65. I'm beginning to think McCain's a mole.



    Time for a cancer screening, there's no way that one's benign.

    ReplyDelete
  66. KatWillow1:49 PM

    "I'm beginning to think McCain's a mole. But who would pay him?" The same folks who pay ArgleBargle?

    ReplyDelete
  67. KatWillow1:57 PM

    If conservatards get this agitated about a Repug being Sec Def, imagine if Obama nominated Gen Wesley Clark, someone who is sane and had glimmerings of professionalism and ability! Then, the fireworks would be fabulous!

    ReplyDelete
  68. KatWillow1:59 PM

    When I read the "If he brings a knife, you bring-" quote, I like to mentally fill it in with suggestions like "-you bring a pack of rabid dogs! Or squirrels!" or "-you bring a CHAINSAW!!!11" etc.

    ReplyDelete
  69. KatWillow2:00 PM

    Can I go on the cruise in his place? Can I have his spot? Gee, imagine an Alicublog Cruise.... sigh. Just thinking about it makes me happy.

    ReplyDelete
  70. KatWillow2:02 PM

    I shall email this word, coprophagous, to K Lopez. She likes new words.

    ReplyDelete
  71. redoubt3:36 PM

    OK--Hagel's a former GOP senator, who's going to be sitting through endless GOP pontification on his fitness for the job, and so forth.

    I imagine he also has at least one briefcase full of "observations" and "notations" to be used against his detractors, if necessary, sealed and ready to hand off to the White House. Or the Justice Department. FWIW.

    ReplyDelete
  72. edroso4:21 PM

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Winslow_Homer_004.jpg

    ReplyDelete
  73. Man, Village Voice commenting sucks.

    ReplyDelete
  74. Halloween_Jack5:14 PM

    I imagine Clint standing around afterwards with a mostly-empty glass of mineral water, and some convention intern coming up to him to take it away, only to have him growl, "I ain't done with this!" The intern backs away, slightly terrified but also in awe, and Clint clutches the glass all the way back to Carmel-by-the-Sea, where he finally sets it down on his kitchen counter, then five minutes later looks at it with puzzlement, wondering why it doesn't match any of his other glasses.

    ReplyDelete
  75. AGoodQuestion5:53 PM

    Two strawmen enter, one strawman... No, that doesn't quite work. McCain needs both of these bad boys up and on their feet.

    ReplyDelete
  76. M. Krebs6:00 PM

    Thanks, Ben. I've always wondered how that was spelled.

    ReplyDelete
  77. Agreed.



    They used to have disqus, and then they decided to make it worse?!?!?
    ~

    ReplyDelete
  78. Obama ought to go all out and stop being "a moderate Republican".


    But he won't. There's no money in that.
    ~

    ReplyDelete
  79. Tell her it's Latin for "You love the Pope more than most."
    ~

    ReplyDelete
  80. smut clyde6:33 PM

    Tell her it's a verb.

    ReplyDelete
  81. smut clyde6:35 PM

    Oh, toast. I thought you said Taitz.

    ReplyDelete
  82. So many turns of phrase that made me literally laugh out loud on this one. They are not paying you enough.

    ReplyDelete
  83. M. Krebs7:59 PM

    How about instead of a cruise, the Savannah Music Festival, March 20 through April 6. You can all crash at my place! (Not really.)


    It's one of the best music festivals in the world, IMHO, and the city is gorgeous that time of year. In other words, it kicks a cruise's ass.

    ReplyDelete
  84. aimai8:04 PM

    A la lanterne, citizen journalist!


    aimai

    ReplyDelete
  85. BigHank538:07 PM

    Tell her liberals hate it more than anything.

    ReplyDelete
  86. MikeJ8:20 PM

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUaWBjxlc5Q

    ReplyDelete
  87. Alexander Von Humbug9:11 PM

    Weasels zipped my flesh.

    ReplyDelete
  88. billcinsd10:21 PM

    I think it's kind of sad that the crappy Republican Secretary of Defense nominee may be the best of President Obama's recent nominees. Jack Lew is an awful choice for Treasury and how exactly has Brennan gotten better since 2008 when he had to withdraw his name from consideration

    ReplyDelete
  89. DocAmazing10:43 PM

    McCain is not a mole. He is a melanoma.

    ReplyDelete
  90. OffWhite11:20 PM

    You're my hero. It's great to see not everyone from Hollywood is a pompous twat.

    ReplyDelete
  91. I'll give you burgers and fries... now, what kind of pie?

    ReplyDelete
  92. Shh!


    You will be scolded for letting the perfect be the enemy of the good.


    Also, when Obama blows up innocent foreigners, it's different (and more forgivable) than when Bush and Cheney did it.


    / Tboggers
    ~

    ReplyDelete
  93. Tell her not to indulge her munchies.

    ReplyDelete
  94. Can I PLEASE dig into the roadkill now? Or do I have to floss this peice of jeans first? Wait... I'm tasting metal...

    ReplyDelete
  95. Halloween_Jack9:37 AM

    Well, at least you're not bitter, bless your heart.

    ReplyDelete
  96. Can I have his spot?

    Any time.


    [WAGGLES EYEBROWS INAPPROPRIATELY]

    sigh. Just thinking about it makes me happy.

    Yeah, I get that a lot.... Well, sometimes.... Okay, never.

    ReplyDelete
  97. John D.10:26 AM

    He's not wrong, either. Unfortunately.

    ReplyDelete
  98. when Obama blows up innocent foreigners, it's different (and more forgivable) than when Bush and Cheney did it.


    No, he's just done a couple of orders of magnitude less of it.


    Left wing moral absolutists: proof that plenty of liberals think math is the devil's witchcraft, too. Who cares about scale and perspective? The number 1 and by extension all mathematics is inherently phallocentric and therefore anybody who does quantitative reasoning about moral issues is a false flag wingnut.

    ReplyDelete
  99. What kind of gibberish is this?


    As long as Obama doesn't approach Bush-Cheney's death count, we should give him a pass?


    You'd have a better argument if you could illustrate the benefits of Obama's killings.


    I guess that is a far more difficult undertaking, because I don't see it being done.



    Instead, it's a lot of puffery about "moral absolutists".
    ~

    ReplyDelete
  100. Cargo8:19 AM

    After which, of course, the Jews can go to hell as far as the evangelicals are concerned. It's the most mercenary and selfish possible reason to support something. "We need you to destroy yourselves as a race so WE can go to heaven! Haha, see ya, suckers!"

    ReplyDelete
  101. "He pulls a knife, you're Magneto. He sends one of yours to the hospital, it's Wolverine anyway. That's the Charles Xavier way, and that's how Rogue sounds so corn pone."

    ReplyDelete